The New York Times has confirmed by deed what they recently stated in words. They have said that they will not allow even handed journalistic procedures to stand in the way of defeating President Trump and his agenda. Brother, was that an understatement.
Printing the Kavanaugh hit piece as they did, with the disqualifying fact removed from the story that the alleged victim denied any knowledge of the event, puts to rest any doubts about whether the New York Times is a newspaper. It’s a newspaper only in the sense that Soviet-era Pravda was a newspaper. The Times records the propaganda of the Progressive Establishment and if any news finds its way into its pages assume an accident was responsible.
But, let’s be clear about what the New York Times and other entities on the Left are trying to do with this Kavanaugh nonsense. They talk about impeachment but they know that without a large majority in the Senate conviction is more or less impossible.
What they actually want to accomplish is create the appearance of a conflict of interest so that Justice Kavanaugh will be under pressure to recuse himself on cases involving women and sexual politics. It’s smart and ugly. It also shouldn’t be allowed to succeed. This is no different from what they did with Justice Thomas back during the Anita Hill travesty. All of this “a woman has to be believed” nonsense is patently formulated to disadvantage men. There is no reason to accept any of it and only a fool would agree to the limitations it introduces to the American legal process. We can assume that from now on any man who comes up for Senate approval will be put through this same kind of charade. We might as well get through these next few cases and harden ourselves to shrugging off this process as just another case of fake news that we have to endure.
Hopefully, this will piss off Kavanaugh so much that he’ll take a special satisfaction in voting against any of the positions that the feminists hold near and dear. Justice Thomas can show him the ropes on that one. And when RBG’s successor is sworn in next spring hopefully it’ll be someone equally unacceptable to the screeching harridans of the left.