ZMan was on a podcast with a guy named Luke Ford (link below). It was almost three hours long! But there was some very good information if you are looking for ZMan’s take on the way the future of a multi-racial America should be addressed. A participant named Ecce got into a dispute with Z about what could be done about the changes taking place in America. Ecce talked about running for elected office and some other ideas for turning around the demographic changes. ZMan basically said that the only important action was to get the white population “woke” to the fact that they needed to vote their interests as white people in order to thrive. The other take-away I heard from him was that he did not believe that republican democracy was going to be a workable political system in a minority-majority America. So that was the gist of it. He had a funny idea for helping wake people up. He said we should leave little slips of paper in bookstore books that said “It’ alright to be white.” Interesting idea.
So, it’s a very long podcast and I’ve given you the main ideas but it is an interesting discussion. And the ZMan can get testy when he thinks someone isn’t saying something constructive. My one thought is that what Trump is doing on immigration and the fight to get non-liberal judges can actually do a lot to help people on our side change conditions in America to something less unfair to the white population. So I see the Trumpocalypse to be an outcome of white backlash against the Leftist attack.
Back on May 28th John Derbyshire wrote an article called “Electoral Gold for the Stupid Party—the Anti-Anti-White Vote.” The gist of the article is that the white population of the United States may finally have reached the point where being demonized by the Left will force them to vote the self interest of their racial identity rather than political affiliation. And the way it was couched was that even people who normally considered American identity as a non-racial concept would recognize that they were now being attacked for no other reason than because they were white. And that rather than allow themselves to be victimized any further they would vote their own interest.
This seems to me to be a very useful way to look at the situation. It recognizes the need for a defensive action to counter a hostile race-based ideology. And it allows people to determine who is part of the problem and who is not.
The first category are the egregious offenders. These are the people teaching our children about “white privilege” and patriarchy and anyone who uses the term cis-gender in anything other than an ironical way. These people are trying to destroy this country by any and all means possible. Examples of this group would be Antifa and that psychotic assistant professor, Melissa Click at the University of Missouri who assaulted the journalist and called for “some muscle” as she tried to remove journalists from a campus protest.
The second group is anyone who thinks these people make sense or even think they’re harmless. These people are helping or at least tolerating this dysfunction. This is a very large group and includes all of the people on the Left and also people on the right who can’t or won’t see what’s happening. This would include people like Mitt Romney, Jeb Bush or any of the NeverTrumpers. These people are just as big a problem as the first group.
The third group is anyone who doesn’t fall into either one of these first two categories. By the logic of the Alt-Right it will soon include the majority of white Americans and no one else. That assumes that every other racial group will see disenfranchising white people as the best strategy to advance their own interests. But I hold out the hope that by strenuously resisting the Anti-White propaganda and labelling it as discrimination we can convince large numbers of other groups to avoid accepting these positions and eventually delegitimize them all together.
And the best way to resist this Anti-White agenda is to support Donald Trump. By his executive actions and by his judicial appointments he is bending the federal government away from the support that the Obama administration and its judicial appointments were giving to this agenda. But in addition, we must make sure that every other elected official we vote for is on our side. Whether it’s the Governor, Mayor, Town Councilman or PTA Representative. And we need to look at the companies we patronize. We should always let a company know if it is working against our interests. Complaining and even boycotting an offensive corporation is a good way to get our message out there.
One thing I’ve recently begun is to compile a list of Right-leaning (or at least non-Left leaning) businesses. I call it my “Directory of Right Wing Businesses.” Currently it’s a rudimentary effort in only a few categories but my intent is to solicit information from site visitors and other sources to make it comprehensive. In this way I would like to provide a resource for people who prefer to support people who believe in the same things they do. This will also make it less likely that they will be de-platformed by a website hosting service or a monetizing company if that company objects to their ideology. If you have any suggestions please drop by and list these companies for others to benefit from.
And finally I like the framing of the movement as a resistance to a discriminatory practice. I think it links it back to the larger issue of Anti-White practices now codefied into the US Government. I am referring to all the racial and sexual entitlement programs that actively discriminate against white people in general and straight white men in very particular. These need to be recognized as unjust and addressed along with these other egregious ideas.
The more I thought about this idea from Derbyshire’s post, the more interesting it became to me. After all, if someone like Roseanne can be fired for making a joke, why can’t public outrage be used to get some college professor or administrator fired for propagandizing our kids about “white privilege” or other such anti-white slanders. The only difference is protected status and if we get wise to ourselves we can overcome that disadvantage through sheer numbers. Think about it. If 10,000 complaints bombard the Dean’s office at a college wouldn’t that make a lovely impression on the board of Trustees and the President of the University.
But the bigger point is that Anti-Anti-White avoids the stigma of White Nationalism. You aren’t trying to organize whites as an identity group. You are fighting against an unjust practice, anti-white bias. Theoretically people of other races should be sympathetic to the cause and could be added to the movement. In reality they won’t. But that’s beside the point and in fact will be one of the advantages. It will highlight that identitarian movements are zero sum games.
Once people start to see how much of the system is rigged against them , it’s only a small step to considering how they can maximize their standing in this hierarchy. Eventually, once it’s been legitimized by public opinion it can be used by politicians to signal their sympathy with white voters. And even better, once it’s established as a point of view, it will become easy to use it to expose the crazies who talk about these things as anti-white racists. Can you imagine the pleasure of using the racism card against some white left-wing university professor? Because just because he’s white doesn’t mean he isn’t biased against white people. After all racism is an equal opportunity profession.
Yeah, I’m definitely starting to like this thing. There are still a lot of angles that need to be considered to maximize the yardage it can give us but I definitely like the idea of becoming an aggrieved minority. Next up will be working this for men and then straight people. After all, each of those is an under attack minority.
Vox linked to this post http://www.unz.com/jderbyshire/electoral-gold-for-the-stupid-party-the-anti-anti-white-vote/
in his post http://voxday.blogspot.com/2018/05/vote-right-vote-white.html
The Anti-Anti-White Vote. I think that’s me! Exactly right. If you’re against me then I have no choice but to be against you. Perfect.
But as Derbyshire states in his post, is the Stupid Party too stupid to reap the benefit? time will tell.