Who’da thunk it?
https://www.rove.com/article/1-30-20-wsj
El Paso is a heavily hispanic district and the local Republican skunked his Democat opponent by a mile. How sad.
Maybe Mexican American Texans should just be called Texans.
Tag: majority-minority
American Greatness Post of the Day – Why America’s ‘Minority Majority’ Will Never Happen By Edward Ring
Interesting post on American Greatness. The article posits the idea that if the large number of mixed race Americans with a white parent identify with the traditional culture of the United States then the erasing of the American culture that many on the dissident right forsee as the inevitable result majority-minority may not be occur.
I won’t pretend to know the answer to this question. But it does appeal to my egalitarian sentiments. But it still has to reckon with the Anti-White propaganda of the Left and the multi-culti nonsense that our corporate masters have saturated our environment with. The article is definitely worth reading. If you have an opinion, leave it in the comments. I’d be interested.
Can a Recognizable America Survive a Majority-Minority Future? – Part 2
In the first part of this post I was looking at the contention that a majority-minority United States would devolve into a Lebanon style multi-ethnic state where one of the tribes would dominate the other groups by threat of force. I don’t see this as necessarily inevitable. Switzerland is an example of a multi-ethnic state that doesn’t involve coercive means. I said I would discuss what things would need to be done to avoid the erasure of the America we know.
I think the biggest problem currently plaguing modern-day America is that a divisive ideology has been allowed to infest schools, colleges and other institutions. This ideology is leftism and it is inherently anti-American propaganda. It attacks all facets of traditional life. And piece by piece it has been allowed to assume the role of normalcy. And always by some twisted logic, justice and kindness are used as the excuse for injustice and oppression. So, to improve the lot of minorities and women, white men must be discriminated against by means of affirmative action. And to make sexually confused people not feel uncomfortable a wedding baker has to either be coerced into pretending he believes in same sex marriage or bankrupted and driven out of business. Confronting these things is the obvious and effective way to put a stop to the primary effects of this poisonous ideology. But it’s just as important to oppose the propaganda and proselytizing efforts that are taking place in schools and corporations. And that will require national, local and individual action. President Trump has taken the first action by appointing conservative judges to the federal courts and specifically the Supreme Court. Once these judges begin removing constitutional protection behind some of these programs like “same sex marriage” the States can make laws to eliminate some of these egregious court overreaches. And once those laws are in place local groups like PTAs and school districts can start eliminating the impact these programs have on children. At the college level it will be necessary to concentrate on the State and local colleges. The Ivy League and lesser private colleges are very heavily infested with leftists and will probably have to be avoided until they either change or go broke.
It goes without saying that some States like East and West Coast blue states will resist any reversal of these policies. It would be unrealistic to believe that just a few years will be needed to change this situation. I assume the only way for blue state residents to avoid the leftist regimes they live under would be to move to red states.
As for the demographic shift to a majority minority population, I would say that many local areas with overwhelming minority populations will go the same route as Boston did with the Irish and New York did with Eastern European Jews. People will vote in their own kind. But if this fails to bring the American Dream, they will vote for someone else who will. People coming to America are looking for the peace and prosperity they’ve heard about. If a Chinese immigrant living in the Research Triangle in North Carolina has a choice to vote for a white pro-business republican or a Chinese Occupy Wall Street socialist I think the republican has a pretty good chance of winning the vote. And if it’s a choice between a white republican and a black democrat from the inner city then I don’t think the black democrat has a chance. As for the impoverished third world refugees currently flooding the country and clogging up the welfare rolls, they need to be ejected. The simplest way to do that is cut off the social services and enforce the laws targeting employers of illegal immigrants. And in general, social benefits need to be eliminated even for legal immigrants. And finally, even legal immigration needs to be curtailed down to a trickle.
If all these ideas were pursued, it would go a long way to stabilizing this country and give us enough time to acculturate the current flood of immigrants. Will it happen? Hard to say. But it will only happen if people demand it. If we just sit back or vote in the same tired hacks, the Bushes and the Romneys, then the America we know will be replaced by a leftist nightmare where everything we believed in has been destroyed. Trump has made a good start. It’s up to all of us to keep the momentum going.
Can a Recognizable America Survive a Majority-Minority Future? – Part 1
The ZMan wrote a very interesting post called, “No Easy Answers.” It’s an analysis of the consequences of large scale non-European immigration into the United States, its consequences and an opinion on the useful response that white Americans should have. I’ll critique the essential portions of the essay to show what I think is the situation. Note that I’ve cut and pasted several of his sentences together to save some space. His text is in bold face font.
“Given current immigration and fertility numbers, America will be a majority-minority country within a generation. The crisis of our age is not just how we respond to this reality, but how we come to accept it. The civic nationalists will move heaven and earth in order to avoid facing demographic reality. For the recently red-pilled, all of their efforts were based on the belief that the solution was simple. Just red-pill everyone and the problem is solved.”
I agree with this analysis and the characterization of the reactions of the civic nationalists and the newly woke dissident right.
“The possibility that liberal democracy inevitably leads to cultural suicide is unpleasant, so even the red-pilled look the other way. The fact is, another bit of that dreaded demographic reality is that what comes next cannot include the current system of governance. In a multicultural society, everyone’s primary loyalty is to their group. Liberal democracy assumes people are loyal to their narrow economic interests. In a majority-minority society, this cannot possibly work. What comes next for us is what we see in the Middle East. In every country, one group dominates the rest, imposing their idea of order on the society. Saddam controlled Iraq for his people. The Persians run Iran. The Muslims run Lebanon, where every hill and valley may as well be its own country. The rule in multi-cultural, multi-tribal societies, is that one tribe rules the rest. That’s our future. The question is which groups will come to dominate the rest and what sort of system will they impose in order to remain in charge.”
ZMan’s thesis is that in a majority-minority society the form of government will devolve into a rule by the strongest tribe. The implied condition is that the rule is enforced by the threat of military or street violence. His examples are middle-eastern dictatorships. I’m not convinced of this for a couple of reasons. One reason is the existence of places like Switzerland and Singapore where a multi-ethnic state exists in a reasonably peaceful coexistence. And secondly a case could be made that the immigration of the Irish and the Eastern and Southern Europeans during the late 19th and early 20th century was an analogous if not equivalent example of a majority-minority situation that while disrupting and modifying the United states, did not destroy the country. The American culture was attractive and strong enough to subsume the new immigrant populations and produce a changed but recognizable United States. The real difference this time is the degree to which there is a significant portion of the American people who are actively working to destroy the existing culture through anti-American and specifically anti-white activities and propaganda. It seems to me the focus of white Americans should be identifying the people and institutions actively working to destroy our people and work to destroy them instead. And the reason I think this will work is that recently there have been some successes. The Supreme Court case where the wedding baker was exonerated based on freedom of religion. The other recent Supreme Court decision that bears on this is the Ohio state law that allowed clearing the voting rolls of ineligible voters. These affirmations of the clear intent of constitutional safeguards will allow the United States to continue to function as the rational and enlightened sort of country it’s always been. And these rulings occurred even before Anthony Kennedy is replaced. Once he has been, I could see a conservative Supreme Court ending affirmative action. Now, the argument against this is that something like ending affirmative action will never be allowed to happen.
But that will be the test. If the ZMan is right then even if the whole white population is “woke,” nothing will be done to alleviate the anti-white activity. But if I’m right then with someone like Trump, a republican who’s actually on our side, we should make some headway and see some victories won. In the next part of this post I’ll try to think of concrete actions that need to be taken.