Pelosi and Romney? How could I resist. Today’s dessert. Enjoy.
Pelosi and Romney? How could I resist. Today’s dessert. Enjoy.
So I haven’t bothered to read any detailed reports of the Senate Trial. But the headlines are amusing and encouraging. Apparently Mitch McConnell has kept his nerve and stonewalled the Dems on all their requests to extend the trial and showboat for the media. Good for you, turtle man. Let him keep that up for another day or two and we can move on to something really important, namely the sign stealing scandal in Major League Baseball. Perhaps Nancy Pelosi can inject herself into that crisis. If I remember my history Nancy was involved in that earlier baseball scandal involving the 1919 Chicago Black Sox when she seduced Shoeless Joe Jackson by showing him a not so shapely ankle in exchange for his cooperation in throwing the World Series. During testimony Shoeless Joe lamented, “That old bag’s ankle was definitely not worth the lifetime baseball ban.” Or so I’ve heard.
The other political story of interest is Bernie Sanders holding his ground against a full court press by the press. They have accused him of everything including being “like Donald Trump,” which is as close as they can come to issuing a fatwa against him. But one story I glanced at claimed that a new nationwide poll has Bernie leading Creepy Uncle Joe for the first time. If Bernie gets the nomination I think it would be the first time in history that a U. S. Presidential election featured only men born in New York City. A definite sign of the apocalypse. A lot of people are saying Bernie is a bigger threat than any of the other Dem candidates. Maybe that’s true. He definitely promises a lot of stuff and he does claim he’s for the people. Well, either way I don’t think any of these doofuses will give the President much trouble.
Work is a bear right now but I’ll try to squeeze in a post whenever humanly possible. I’ve got some more country music reviews and of course Star Trek must go on. I’ll add some more stuff to reclaiming the family and of course The He-Man Woman Haters’ Club but those posts shouldn’t be rushed. They need time and loving care.
I anticipate this trial to be a ridiculous farce with the Dems attempting to use headlines as a way to force the Senate Republicans to cave on a long list of hostile witnesses in order to drag this thing out. And the MSM will amplify their nonsense incessantly. And hopefully Mitch McConnell will ignore all this and only provide the minimum time and air time to the Democrats.
What isn’t certain is how much of a show McConnell will allow. If McConnell had 51 reliable votes, he could go for a preliminary vote to refuse to go through with the trial. But as I’ll enumerate later there aren’t 51 reliable votes. The next least offensive choice is to forgo any evidence and after the two sides make their opening statements have the Senate go directly to a vote on conviction. That President Trump would win such a vote is a foregone conclusion. After that we get to uglier scenarios. If the President’s counsel and the House losers get to call witnesses this will be a three-ring circus complete with clowns and a freak show.
If I were to guess I’m going with a vote right after the opening statement. That would seem to be the option that we know we have the votes for that does the least damage.
But one thing is certain. A number of Senate Republicans will be turncoats and stab the President in the back. What this Trial will do is expose all the unreliable and/or hostile Senate Republicans. We can make a few assumptions ahead of time. Mitt Romney will be a turncoat. He’ll immediately start spouting Democrat talking points before even they do. Susan Collins of Maine is the most vulnerable Republican due to the Massachusetts colonization of Maine over the last twenty years. And of course, no list of unreliable Senate Republicans is complete without Lisa Murkowski of Alaska. She voted against Justice Kavanaugh and she’ll vote against President Trump just because she can. So, these are the knowns. Who are the unknowns? That is the good that will come out of this. We’ll find every single weak-kneed sister and every double crosser in the Senate.
So, there you have it. I have managed to come up with a bright side to the Impeachment travesty. Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, Nadler and the other nimrods have assembled this sideshow that I will make a definite point to avoid but based just on the voting transcript I’ll have a perfect count of the Senate Republicans that we can and cannot count on when the chips are down. That’s my silver lining.
In 2018 and 2019 I posted Roosevelt’s “Man in the Arena” speech as one of my quotes of the day. Here it is:
It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.
I thought of this quote when all the usual suspects started criticizing the President for his courageous decision to eliminate General Soleimani. Chuck Schumer criticized the President for not consulting Congress. The stupidity of this argument being that Congress is a sieve of destructive leaks and passing along this information might have compromised the mission and even led to intelligence personnel being captured or killed.
Then you have that nitwit Pelosi claiming that Soleimani was such an important Iranian that killing him was unthinkable. So, the man who personally arranged for the killing and maiming of thousands of American servicemen and who was currently looking to increase that score shouldn’t be eliminated because his work was too important. I know of nothing more idiotic said by a top US political leader since Pelosi’s last blunder where she claimed that we had to institute Obamacare before we knew what it included. She is indeed a dope for all seasons.
And all the talking heads of the networks working overtime to frighten the American public with propaganda about American deaths from the missile barrage and declaring that killing Soleimani was an unthinkable tactical blunder that we would all rue.
All of these naysayers are the critics of Roosevelt’s speech. Bystanders sniping at the Man in the Arena. But President Trump is that man. In a situation like the current United States deployment in Iraq and Afghanistan there is no safe or easy choice. Every day is fraught with peril and every decision must be weighed.
With the Iranians looking to distract their citizens from their poverty the mullahs used Soleimani to generate good news by attacking their enemies through proxies in other places like Iraq and Syria. And with the knowledge that President Trump wants to withdraw US troops from Iraq and Afghanistan and place them in secure bases in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait it would be easy for the Iranians to claim a victory if they attacked our vacating troops. They would spin it that they chased us out.
If the President does intend to redeploy our troops away from Iraq and Afghanistan it would be preferable to accompany such a change with a show of strength to remind the hostile (and friendly) nations in the area that American military strength isn’t something to be despised.
To that end killing Soleimani just as he was ramping up attacks on Americans in Iraq was a high risk, high reward option. Killing him in such a situation demonstrated our operational intelligence capability, technological superiority and the high regard our President has for the safety of our troops. He would show that the death of an American contractor in Iraq needed to be avenged with the killing of the man who was ultimately responsible for that death. And no consideration was given to the rank of either man.
But of course, consideration was given to what the retaliation by the Iranians could have been. Getting into a major war with a regional power like Iran is a very serious situation. Such a war would be a horrible problem for an election effort and would throw the advantage to the Democrats in November.
And that risk means that ordering the attack on Soleimani was a very risky decision that called for the most careful exercise of judgement. None of the other men who served as President in the last thirty years, neither of the Bushes or Clinton or Obama would have taken that risk under the present circumstances. They would have hunkered down and endured the slow drip of casualties and then withdrawn our troops under fire. President Trump showed a fine sense of tactical judgement and he has been rewarded by circumstances that put him in a strong strategic position with respect to Iran. The Man in the Arena deserves praise and recognition for his wisdom and courage.
‘Twas the night before Christmas when all through the House
Not a creature was stirring, ‘cept Pelosi the louse
The articles were strung in the indictment with care
In hopes that public would believe what was there;
The Senators were nestled all snug at Club Med
In hopes that their war chests soon would be fed;
And the Post there in D.C. and the Times in Big App’
Had taken a break from shoveling crap.
When on the House lawn there arose such a clatter
Even Pelosi’s dead heart had to go pitter patter;
Away to Security she hobbled to see
What the closed-circuit screen would show it to be.
The moon on the breast of the new-fallen snow
Gave the lustre of mid-day to objects below,
When, what to her big bulging eyes should appear,
But Marine Copter One setting down in high gear
With a big orange rider who made such a thump
As he stepped on the ground, she knew it was Trump
More rapid than eagles his lawyers they came,
And he whistled, and shouted, and called them by name;
Now Jared, now Rudi, now Johnny, now Billie
Now I don’t know the others so let’s not be silly.
Take the bugs from the phones, take the mikes from the walls
Now indict away, indict away, indict away all.
He wore a blue suit that bulged here and there
And orange was the color of his face and his hair
Across his smart phone his fingers did crowd
And the words that he typed he mumbled aloud
“Pelosi’s appearance is ugly and sad
The crimes she committed are stupid and bad.
I cannot impeach her, as she did to me
But I’ll get her for graft and away throw the key.”
The men spoke not a word, but went straight to their work,
And collected the data then turned with a jerk,
And hauling their evidence bags to the ship
they jumped up aboard without even a slip
Trump sprang to his craft, to his team gave a whistle,
And away they all flew like the down of a thistle.
But she heard him tweet out, as he flew through the air,
“Pelosi in prison, that’s not so unfair!”
Don’t the Democrats have more than this for their Impeachment Circus? Can they keep this going for more than a week? If not, I think they’re going to be upstaged by whatever balloon mishaps occur during the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade. In the classic Seinfeld episode, I believe it was Woody the Woodpecker who suffered a puncture wound and deflated on top of Elaine’s boss Mr Pitt. I’m sure at this point Woody has been retired in favor of some kind of trans-gender super hero but either way Pelosi et alia are going to have to come up with some kind of show stopper. Perhaps they can perform a séance and have the ghost of Jeffrey Epstein accuse President Trump of strangling him in his New York jail cell.
Honestly, the only thing I can guess is that the DNC is so desperate for Creepy Uncle Joe to be the candidate that they had to do something crazy like this to stop the investigation into Hunter’s pathetic graft expedition in the Ukraine. And I don’t see how this helps. If there is anyone on the planet at this point unaware that Joe used his position to force a foreign government to cancel an investigation of his son’s shakedown activities it could only be among coma victims.
The good thing about this feckless farce is that it gives the Republicans the perfect center piece around which to campaign against them. If they had any wit about them at all, they would seize on this as the embodiment of an infantile and malign force that possesses no positive qualities and is only meant to act as a brake (resistance) to an actual agenda. Pushing for a border wall in light of the Cartels’ victory over the Mexican Army would be a winning strategy.
But I have little if any faith in the Republicans at this point. They are only slightly less useless than Pelosi and her crew. At the rate that the Republicans are retiring from the House it may soon be a strictly Democrat establishment. It’s a pity. It seems as if President Trump will be forced to do the whole thing by himself.
Well I’m actually very busy getting work done so that I can have some time off around Thanksgiving and Christmas. I’m impatiently waiting on Horowitz’s report and the subsequent indictments by Barr’s staff but I haven’t the patience or interest in reading any of the half-witted descriptions by the desperate MSM propagandists of the side show that Schiff and Pelosi are attempting to sell.
So, unless Pelosi is going to do a geriatric strip tease or Schiff is prepared to perform an Aztec sacrificial slaughter on the steps of the Capitol, I’m going to have to decline paying any further notice to this sad non-spectacle.
But bring on the next crazy show by all means. This one isn’t funny enough. In fact, I think I’ll re-watch the Seinfeld episode. Watching Mr. Pitt struggling with the deflating Woody the Woodpecker balloon was way funnier than this. Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha.
The Impeachment of the President of the United States was an unheard-of idea for most of the first century of the country’s existence. It took the Civil War and its partisan aftermath to produce the first impeachment and even then, President Andrew Johnson was acquitted. When over a hundred years later Richard Nixon was threatened with impeachment, he became the first president to resign his office rather than subject the nation to such a trauma. But twenty-five years later the standards of the country had eroded sufficiently that not only did Bill Clinton refuse to resign but he was actually acquitted of perjury and obstruction charges despite documentary and physical evidence to the contrary. Now twenty years of polarization past that point it seems probable that a politically motivated impeachment charge by the Democrats against a popular Republican president might actually be a net positive for the president.
For the whole period of Donald Trump’s presidency and even before his inauguration, various Democrat officials and almost all of the Media have bandied about the impeachment threat. When the Mueller investigation collapsed there was a short respite when even the Democrat leaders admitted that impeachment was no longer an option.
But with the recent Ukraine events Nancy Pelosi was hounded by the younger members of the Democrat caucus to announce that she has initiated a formal impeachment action. Wow, that sounds serious! But wait. “She cannot unilaterally decide we’re in an impeachment inquiry. What she said today makes no difference about what’s been going on,” House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said after Pelosi’s announcement.” In other words, in order for an actual impeachment investigation to be started the full House has to vote on and approve it and Pelosi has refused to bring one to the floor. So, what is actually going on here?
Despite what AOC’s Goon Squad would have you believe, impeaching President Trump on spurious charges would most likely lose Nancy Pelosi the House Democrat Majority and her Speaker’s chair after the 2020 election. And Pelosi knows that. In addition, the chance of the Senate convicting the President is effectively zero. Twenty republican senators would have to join the democrats for the necessary two thirds majority and that’s even assuming that senators like Joe Manchin of West Virginia would vote for something so unpopular with their constituencies. Then, what is the strategy here?
My interpretation of the situation is that Democrats have to appear to be holding the President accountable for investigating members of the Obama administration that are known to have been involved in influence peddling. That includes, at least, Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton and John Kerry. Actually, allowing an investigation of these sacred cows of the Democrat establishment risks exposing levels of corruption that would certainly upend the American political order.
But they are trying to use the threat of impeachment only. Because once they actually impeach him and he is acquitted by the Senate then Congress is basically a spent force. They will have done their worst and the last bullet will have been fired. At that point his continued existence as president will be a constant reminder to them and the rest of the country of their impotence. All of their posturing and rhetoric will seem hollow and ridiculous. And ridiculous is a very bad thing for influence peddlers.
What is difficult for me to determine is exactly what the President’s strategy is here. Is he trying to force an impeachment or is it just collateral to his desire to punish the cabal that tried to overturn his election? I think either one of those two scenarios is possible. Personally, I hope he is working to expose the criminal conspiracy that exists against him. Nothing would make me happier than hearing that Comey, McCabe, Brennan and Clapper were indicted and awaiting trial for treason. The damage these people have done to the country is hard to overestimate.
But is it possible that President Trump is trying to get himself impeached? It seems, at first glance, unthinkable. Why would a president risk removal from office no matter how unlikely? And if running for re-election wouldn’t he worry that the impeachment stigma would destroy his electability? Maybe not.
The United States has become almost completely polarized. The Left/Right divide has become a chasm both wide and deep. Like the opposite sides of the Grand Canyon each can see the other from a vast distance with the space between a desolate no-man’s land. So, impeachment will only serve to seal the fate of any Democrats still serving office in Red areas of the country and alternatively for Republicans in Blue areas. It will stoke the resentment of partisans on both sides of the divide and fit in with each side’s narrative. But being acquitted by the Senate will uplift the spirits of the Right and depress those of the Left. In that sense it would be a net positive for the President’s side and may have been calculated by the political experts as a winning strategy. It seems bizarre but I concede it is possible.
How does one decide which of these two situations is the actual one? You probably can’t do it definitively but I guess one sign would be whether President Trump provides further excuses for the House to investigate him. Let’s say he calls up the British Prime Minister and asks for him to investigate any links between the Clinton campaign and the Steele Dossier. With the almost endless leaks coming out of the intelligence agencies we’d be hearing about it before the phone call ended. Though, even that would still leave open the possibility that the President was more interested in getting to the bottom of the coup. But at the very least it would mean that he was unworried about impeachment.
And honestly it appears that there is no reason to fear impeachment any more. Not even the Media will pretend there is any objectivity toward President Trump. In fact, they are proud to say they are abandoning evenhandedness to do whatever it takes to destroy his presidency. So, there is no danger of any of the President’s voters believing anything the Media or the Democrats say.
So here we are in the brave new world where a Republican President isn’t afraid of impeachment but the Democrat Speaker of the House is. Who knows, maybe Pelosi will back down sometime in the next few weeks. I’m no longer surprised by anything that happens in our politics. The Democrats stopped following the rules half a century ago and we finally have a man who can fight fire with fire. This wild ride that we’ve been on since Donald Trump entered the political arena a few years ago promises to upend all the remaining stupidities that the hapless Republican establishment figures put up with in the past. Here’s hoping that in 2021 President Trump has a reliable Republican congress, a swamp drained of all Deep State saboteurs and a robustly conservative Supreme Court to move us forward into a more hopeful future.
President Trump appears to me to be forcing Nancy Pelosi and the Democrat candidates for president to line up behind the Four Horsefaces of the Apocalypse. Opinions differ as to how intentional are the rhetorical attacks that President Trump initiates on Twitter. I would have to say that this one is extremely deliberate. Nancy Pelosi was actively reining in these bomb throwers just to protect herself and the rest of the 2020 candidates from being tarred with the same crazy brush that these females decorate themselves with. But once he laid on the “go back to your rathole country,” nice and thick Nancy and all the other democrat clowns were backed into a corner and had to embrace the four harridans.
This is brilliant. These harpies are on record with so much anti-American venom that even a child will be able to put together a greatest hits reel for the Republican 2020 campaigns. Who knows? It might even be possible to unseat a few of these psychos. But regardless, what it might really do is energize the democrat primary voters to throw poor old Creepy Uncle Joe under the bus and nominate Kamala Harris or even (be still my beating heart) Cory Booker! Can you imagine Spartacus up there on the stage with President Trump at the debates? It’s all Booker can do now to remember to put his pants on. He’ll probably bolt if he gets too flustered.
All along I’ve maintained that the power brokers in the DNC will put their thumbs on the scale and throw the nomination to Biden. But what if Trump pushes the Dems to a place much farther along in their intersectional identity politics calculus? What if his insults catalyze the anti-white position into a mandate? Then Bernie, Biden, Buttigieg and even Warren become personae non gratae. Oh, wouldn’t that be lovely?
It is my contention that Barack Obama’s obvious anti-white bias and the pathetic economic policies of his administration have inoculated America from feeling racist for voting against a black candidate. That and the drum beat of woke sentiment has finally started to wise up Americans to the Left’s white guilt playbook. That’s why I think a Harris or Booker candidacy would be a boon to President Trump and all of us. If Harris gets blown out in a landslide it would put to rest the whole demographics is destiny hustle. As many on the Dissident Right have pointed out the Coalition of the Entitled don’t really like each other all that well. In fact, the only thing they dislike more than each other is normal white men. So, if you pick a candidate that doesn’t belong to the particular sliver of the coalition that is up for grabs (Hispanics for instance) then chances are you could be out of luck on Election Day if the Republican does a good job of selling his record or platform. And if some of those slivers, like white women and Hispanic traditionalists, start thinking that their interests actually align better with the Republicans than with the America-hating Squad then things could get very interesting.
So, my thesis is that President Trump is jabbing at “the Squad” in order to drive the Democrats to solidarity around them. His intent is to associate the Democrats with these America-hating crazy women and make them less electable. And possibly he would like to radicalize the Democrat primary electorate to nominate a sure loser like Harris or Booker. Now, have I changed my mind about the inevitability of Biden? Not yet. These things blow over and Biden really is the only dwarf with even a snowball’s chance in Hell in 2020. I’ll recalibrate based on whether President Trump’s attacks on the Horsefaces continue or abate. Either way I’m really enjoying this extended election season and I anticipate a bumper crop of election night Democrat caterwauls.
After you’ve read enough sexbot articles on Drudge maybe switch to something interesting
Gotta love a President with a sense of humor.
The President said the meeting was a total waste of time. Let’s hope this means he’ll starve the buggers out.