I find archaic human paleoanthropology fascinating. The impact of better radioactive dating methods and now, DNA analysis has had a remarkable effect on the state of our knowledge. Previously poorly-dated specimens were used to justify very late dates for when Homo sapiens, his predecessor H. heidelbergensis and the even earlier H. errectus left Africa. More accurate information leaves it an open question whether sapiens evolved in Africa or Eurasia. And the presence of H. neanderthalensis and H. denisoviensis and possibly other sister species of H. sapiens scattered around in Eurasia makes the point even more acute that our species radiated and developed and then remixed inside of Eurasia. And the fact that all traces of Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA are lacking completely in Africa only highlights the fact that Africa became a sort of isolated group of populations separate from the evolution that was taking place to the north.
What strikes me as very interesting is just how quickly humans change in reaction to their environment. Just look around at the appearance of modern humans the world round. Various types of Africans, Northern Europeans, Southern Europeans, Middle Easterners, South Asians, East Asians, the Australian aborigines and the New Guineans, the Native Americans, the South Sea Islanders and many other groups have differentiated from each other over the course of not millions of years but thousands. Our hair, eyes, skin, the shapes of our faces and many other traits have changed in order to adapt to our environments. Even something as fundamental as blood types are affected. We are an adaptable species. And I think that because of human squeamishness we have been less than logical with our designation of what is a species, subspecies or race when it comes to man.
After all, we’ve managed to crowd all of the “races” of man into one species without the thought of sub-specifying ourselves. But the Neanderthals and Denisovans (whom we know bred with humans) we kick into separate species altogether. That seems a bit much. I remember in old books we sometimes saw Homo sapiens neanderthalensis as a subspecies of ours. Surely our “kissing cousins” deserve at least that small a consideration for providing us with a few percentages of our genetic material (not to mention red hair!).
In general, I’m not willing to toss any of our closest relatives under the bus. H. heidelbergensis and H. errectus were present in Eurasia for a very long time along with these later editions and what seems reasonable is that the same kind of interbreeding and intergradations occurred at earlier times spawning other “species” of Homo that we either can’t distinguish or haven’t found yet. And whether these archaic humans met in the Mediterranean or the more northern regions the same kind of mixing and changing was going on.
So, man is ever-changing and since our brain is our defining facet it makes sense that changes in our brains is where we’ll see evolution hard at work. The only question is whether this evolution will be untrammeled or will it be directed. Artificial intelligence is the prize that technologists and industrialists tout as the future. Will our brains be replaced with silicon? Will we be turned into zoo animals that eventually will be euthanized when we’ve been rendered powerless?
I tend to think not. I’m betting on the hominins. For all our bad habits and shortcomings (and there are many) I think there is a greatness in our line. I think we can still find our purpose on this planet. And I don’t want to disown any of our kin here on Earth. We fight each other and hate each other for our differences and just because we want each other’s stuff. But that is part of being human. We still have time to figure out a way to get along regardless of all our differences. And as our brains get stronger so we will. We have some important fate ahead of us. And I doubt that it involves becoming Eloi to Silicon-Morlocks.