Only a seriously unserious photographer would spend 350 bucks to rent a camera like the A9 for a week and then use it as frivolously and haphazardly as I just did with it. My only defense is that I only wanted to establish one thing. I wanted to know whether the autofocus was great, good or as miserable as on my A7S. It\u2019s not a good defense. Enough reports are out there to show that it\u2019s much, much better than the A7S. In fact there is plenty of testimony for it being better than any of the A7 cameras and for it being at least comparable to high end Canon and Nikon DSLRs.
\nWell, call me Doubting Thomas. I needed to see it with my own eyes and experience it with my own hands.
\nOkay, big surprise, it\u2019s really very, very good. Put the camera on center point focus and point it at anything inside or outside and it focuses instantaneously and flawlessly. Beyond that I did some tests with tracking and eye-focus of moving targets and it was pretty good. It wasn\u2019t perfect or flawless but that could be attributed to my lack of understanding of which setting should be used when and my lack of technique for shooting sports or occasion subjects.
\nAt this point you can see that there will be no big surprises or important information coming out of this post (unless you are a doubter like me and for some reason trust me more than the reputable reporters who\u2019ve already sung the A9\u2019s praises). What this is is a personal opinion about why the A9 is an important camera for Sony shooters.
\nAs anyone who has been following my photography posts knows I have been a somewhat patient long-suffering Sony camera user. As an owner of the last full frame DSLR from Sony (the praiseworthy A-850) I have been waiting and suffering through the long chain of mirrorless cameras that Sony produced. From the NEX-5N up to and including the A7R II I have been disappointed by the incompetent autofocus and mediocre shooting experience of these cameras compared to a basic DSLR like the A-850.
\nThose days are over.
\nThe A9 is a better camera than the A-850 in every way.
\nAnd here\u2019s my take on why this is important. I don\u2019t have to abandon Sony. I can keep my lense and buy into their overpriced stuff and at least I won\u2019t have to sell it all in a fire sale and go over to Canon or Nikon. The features that the A9 has are remarkable. No black out shooting, excellent indoor and outdoor autofocus, low light capability, silent shutter, very short exposure time, you name it, it\u2019s got it.
\nThe only downside, $4,500 price tag. I am not that nuts. You see I\u2019m a hobbyist. I don\u2019t shoot weddings and I don\u2019t work for CBS sports. I do not actually need 20 frames per second. Nor do I want to pay for it.
\nWhat I do want is that fantastic autofocus and the no blackout shooting experience. Well actually, I\u2019d also like to get that bigger battery too. Unfortunately, it\u2019s starting to get closer to most of the camera. Damn. Well anyway, I want an A7 III with all the goodies of the A9 but without the mortgage. Three grand? Sure. Thirty five hundred? Ahhhh, I dono. So come on Sony make it a Merry Christmas. After all I have been patient.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Only a seriously unserious photographer would spend 350 bucks to rent a camera like the A9 for a week and then use it as frivolously<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[110,33,20,32,330,18],"class_list":["post-1420","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-photography","tag-a9","tag-mirrorless","tag-sony","tag-sony-a7-cameras","tag-sony-a7-iii","tag-sony-a7s"],"yoast_head":"\n