Donald Trump signed an executive order that specified that the United States federal government only recognizes two sexes; male and female and these equate to the sexes identified by the biological realities of nature.\u00a0 And he used this basis to forbid biological males from participating in Title IX protected women\u2019s sports.\u00a0 This provides a basis for activities excluding one sex from the other based on differences in biological identity.\u00a0 So that\u2019s part one.<\/p>\n
But now it\u2019s time to move forward.\u00a0 Now it\u2019s time to acknowledge that there should be activities that males want to participate without women involved.\u00a0 And once again, it is based on biology.\u00a0 It\u2019s very simple.\u00a0 Women are inherently irritating to men.<\/p>\n
Now, I say this as a man whose been married to the same woman for forty-eight years.\u00a0 This May I\u2019ll have known Camera Girl for fifty years.\u00a0 She is a delightful woman.\u00a0 Smart, pretty, wise, witty; you name it.\u00a0 She is the greatest joy of my whole existence on this planet.\u00a0 But there are times when I get together with the guys that having her there would be a big mistake.\u00a0 She\u2019s a woman.\u00a0 She\u2019s not as lazy as we are.\u00a0 Or as crass.\u00a0 And she doesn\u2019t care about nuclear weapons, the Roman Empire, the Lord of the Rings, William Shatner, bad movies in general or anything that would qualify her for a get together with the guys.\u00a0 And if she did care about those things she would be too strange a woman for me to get involved with.<\/p>\n
And even if she was still the same wonderful person she is now and wanted to hang out with the guys, it still would be a bad idea.\u00a0 And that\u2019s because men occasionally want to escape the company of women.\u00a0 We want to be unfair and objectivize women and say things about them that they won\u2019t like.\u00a0 Basically, we want the space and freedom to act like thirteen-year-old boys again.\u00a0 We want to form our own hierarchies based on whatever primitive and undemocratic criteria we decide on and we absolutely, positively don\u2019t want to fall under the authority of a woman.\u00a0 Now that\u2019s clear enough.\u00a0 We want our space.<\/p>\n
Now how do we get it back?<\/p>\n
It seems to me; the most logical way is to follow reason and fact.\u00a0 If the Title IX laws protecting separate (but unequal) women\u2019s programs is constitutional then it stands to reason that separate organizations based on the differences between men and women is also constitutional.\u00a0 Fraternal organization can become just that again.\u00a0 And sororal clubs can provide women with their own spaces.<\/p>\n
Now whether any of the male organizations that have already been neutered by the government can be resuscitated is highly doubtful.\u00a0 The Boy Scouts of America have just this month officially eliminated the word \u201cboy\u201d from their name.\u00a0 I don\u2019t see how that damage can be undone.\u00a0 But new organizations can be started that will replace these hollowed out shells of the past.<\/p>\n
And the time to make this happen is now.\u00a0 With this Supreme Court and President Trump in charge the Justice Department could be the conduit for cases to push for the return of freedom of association.\u00a0 The only real question is whether there is an organization that would be willing to be the test case.\u00a0 It should be a new organization that starts fresh and goes after landmark legislation to end the present persecution of male only activities.<\/p>\n
And I think the perfect test case should be my own favorite named organization; The He-Man Woman Hater\u2019s Club.\u00a0 The name says it all.\u00a0 Now all we have to do is get that feminist Republican jurist on board; John Roberts.<\/p>\n