“Four very young men, all carrying guns, beat me violently down to the ground in front of our kids,” Shivanthi Sathanandan said in a Facebook post. “The young men held our neighbors up at gunpoint when they ran over and tried to help me. All in broad daylight.”
Well. Four juveniles. So I think we can say it was illegal for them to have guns. Does this liberal now understand that gun laws will do nothing?
No.
Further in her post she says they need to get the guns off the street.
It isn’t the gun, lady. It’s the person using it.
It is so sad when people refuse to learn.
Here’s a thought: What if even one of her neighbors had been armed?
The outcome would have been very different. The beating would not have gone on as long as it did and, maybe, some bad guys would be in jail.
Next month she’ll be back at the Democrat party office and she’ll change her tune. But what she will do is move to a safer neighborhood.
Probably. One with walls and private security. Can’t have the leaders of the party subject to the consequences of their actions.
There would be one effect of increasing gun laws: to decrease the probability that any given victim would be armed.
I believe that is the desired outcome.
So, I read that the female governor of New Mexico has declared a state of emergency and banned carrying guns for 30 days. She says there is a limit on upholding the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
“No constitutional right, in my view, including my oath, is intended to be absolute,” she said, adding, “There are restrictions on free speech; there are restrictions on my freedoms.”
Yeah. She’s wrong.
This is what we’ll be running up against. They’re showing their true colors.
And they will continue to do this until they get slapped. Hard!
Failure to re-elect, even impeachment is not enough.
Every legal gun owner in NM needs to file a lawsuit against this tyrant.
She needs to be financially destroyed to serve as an object lesson to all would be tyrants.
It would be nice to see those stealing our rights challenged in the Supreme Court.
You have to wonder what else of the Bill of Rights can be eliminated at her whim? Also, if governors can eliminate the Bill of Rights, how far down the chain does this ability devolve? Mayors? City Councilmen? Everyone? Who is to stop them?
Of late I have become tremendously cynical about what our “government servants” would consider beyond the pale.