So, this week, in the middle of all the usual crises in Dunwich I got a visit from the First Selectman. I was out in the fields when suddenly the shadow of a five-hundred-foot eldritch horror darkened my path. Now tact is always the key survival trait when dealing with the First Selectman. So, I greeted him respectfully and asked him to what I owed the honor of his attention.
He got right to the point. His kin were having a visit to Dunwich and he wanted to make sure they had a nice stay. Well, when Azathoth, Yog-Sothoth and Nyarlathotep come to town, they’re bound to be hungry from the interdimensional transit and will expect something substantial with which to restore the tissues. So, Cthulhu wanted me to arrange the menu. Since Dunwich is a farming town, I suggested cattle. He gave me a shake of his cephalopodic head and reminded me that all three visitors were obligate anthropophages. Well, that would make this a tricky assignment. Even though I’m regularly fed up with most of my neighbors, I’m not really comfortable with them being eaten alive by monsters from beyond space. And I especially don’t want to be the one feeding them to the hideous entities. But neither did I want to be next on the menu for refusing. So, what to do?
Well, it took a little work but by the creative lowering of our fairground fees I was able to attract and book the Democratic Socialists of America’s New England political rally for that weekend. And wouldn’t you know Graham Plattner was the keynote speaker! Now without a doubt an oysterman would provide just the tang of New England cuisine that the First Selectman’s family would find irresistible. My plan is to let the rally reach a crescendo of communistic agitation and then use a couple of fire houses to marinate the crowd. I gave the First Selectman his choice of sauces; classic Worcestershire cocktail, garlic butter, Bang Bang or a Remoulade. Being old fashioned he went with the garlic butter.
I know, I know. What kind of heartless monster would feed his fellow humans to creatures of cosmic horror. I did think a while about it. But then I remembered that Bernie Sanders and AOC were also supposed to be attending. So that seemed to assuage my conscience.
But today I had new pangs of guilt. I mean Azathoth, Yog-Sothoth and Nyarlathotep have never caused me any harm and here I was feeding them some of the most toxic creatures on the planet. I mean, what if they got really sick. It would be my fault. At the very least maybe I should provide a photo of Plattner to the Great Old Ones and warn them that he probably had at least a sixty-proof rating and anyone with an alcohol problem should probably steer clear of the pugnacious oysterman and stick to something a little less spicy. Well, anyway, the First Selectman seems pleased with the menu. That’s something.
I’m cheating here. I really don’t have some authoritative answer but I’m interested in opinions. I mean I have my own but I’d like to hear from you readers. I guess I’m trying to separate what people want to see filmed from what they think would film best. For instance, someone might love the book Stranger in a Strange Land but think that it wouldn’t translate to the screen at all. And conversely you might not care for a book but recognize that it would make an amazing visual spectacle. So that’s the challenge. What you pick could be your favorite sf book but only if you think that it would be a terrific movie.
So, to be fair I’ll have to pick a book and tell why the movie version would be phenomenal. Hmmmm.
Alright, so I’ll pick a controversial book; Heinlein’s “Starship Troopers.” And I’ll say why. I’m basing my opinion on the 1997 film directed by Paul Verhoeven. Verhoeven made the movie to be an ironic send-up of what he considered a fascist state. So, he was mocking the military that makes up the whole story. And yet, despite this hostile take on Heinlein’s book, the film is a staggeringly vivid visual spectacle. The vistas of battle on planet and in space are remarkable even though this movie used CGI effects that are several decades out of date. So, I try to imagine what could be done if someone who liked the story and the world it envisions wrote and directed it. I think it could be amazing.
Now let me add that I don’t think this would happen in a million years. Woke Hollywood has no interest in a pro-military sf war movie. Ever since Vietnam they’ve made more than ten anti-war movies for every pro-military one. But since I’m not asking, “what’s the movie most likely to be made,” I feel I can select the story that I favor regardless of its chances of actually appearing on the screen. I think of the visual showing Buenos Aires being obliterated from space by the Bugs and I think of what the emotional impact of that scene would be. And if the Rico character were presented as intended, I think it would be a sympathetic one for the male portion of the audience. Of course, the jury is still out on whether I would keep the communal male/female shower facilities that Verhoeven introduced into his film. It has its advantages and disadvantages as a cinematic device. But I would demand that the movie stay as close to Heinlein’s book as possible.
So come on everybody, pick the story that is perfect for the big screen and give your reasons why you think so. And I won’t restrict this by the book’s age. It could be Frankenstein, War of the Worlds or anything else. Even if it’s already been filmed several times, say why a new version would work. But for pity’s sake don’t give me a woke book. My stomach isn’t as strong as it used to be.
Replies:
Ed Brault:
Boy, this is a tough one. There are several I could choose from.
Larry Niven’s “A Gift from Earth” Set on a distant colony planet, it has action, suspense, political upheaval, and a rather unique social commentary on the impact of genetic engineering. The visuals would be well within CGI and other technical effects tech that has been around since Stargate SG-1.
Another would be “The Long ARM of Gil Hamilton. Crime and mystery in a not-too-distant future. Telepathy, psi powers, black market organ transplants, and a unique form of addiction that may not be that far off. All done in an almost-contemporary setting, just add automated flying cars, and a society so desperate for life-extending transplant material, they make almost any crime Capital, even False Advertising, sending the perp to the Organ Banks. Three short stories that put a creative spin on murder. The capper is the Jigsaw Girl, set on the Moon, with murder, attempted murder, conspiracy, clones, and interplanetary politics.
“The Children’s Hour”, set on the Wunderland colony on a planet of Alpha Centauri. Conquered by the felinoid race, the Kzinti, and it is used as a staging base for the planned conquest of Earth. Three invasion fleets have been beaten off, but a new Governor has brought a new philosophy of war. Instead of “Scream and Leap” he advocates careful study of the enemy, how he thinks, and how “inferior” technologies may be used in VERY sophisticated ways against a more advanced force. Earth’s GHQ wants him dead, and a special team is sent to get him, by a very fiendish, complex method, all set in a background very reminiscent of “Casablanca”.
Chemist:
We agree on Starship Troopers. I think it could be redone with more attention to Rico and his development – especially his reconciliation with his dad. Another Heinlein – Puppet Masters. I know. Been done. I think it could have been done better. It already has a very strong female character without being woke. Robert set Puppet Masters up for a sequel but never wrote it. I’d like to see a sequel where the humans take the war to Titan. I think a focus on the man / dog teams would be excellent. And we know how Hollywood loves sequels – here are two movies just waiting to be made.
Now if you want to make a serious romp movie – any of Harry Harrison’s “Stainless Steel Rat” books would do. If I were writing it, I’d lean into the anti-government aspect. I think it would play well today.
Tregonsee:
Well I would like to see Starship Troopers done correctly. I imagine RAH is still revolving in his grave or haunting Mr. Verhoeven over the 1997 travesty. I think The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress MIGHT work. I’ve always thought the first of Zelazny’s Amber Series Nine Princes in Amber might make a nice movie, or better an 8-10 1hr show series (with other Amber Books to follow if it works). Larry Niven’s Ringworld or Protector might work, although Ringworld will have to be edited lest it skate into deep R or NR rated territory. For romps I favor Connie Willis’ To Say Nothing Of The Dog it is eminently filmable, though again a series might work better. The time travel nonsense is just absolutely beautiful and hilarious; there is a romance (or three), and we rescue an extinct species (spoilers 🙂 ) of great interest. And last but not least, the first couple of the Honor Harrington series might be fun, In particular On Basilisk Station and Honor of The Queen . I’d love to see it get to Field of Dishonor but that’s 5 books in and because of prolong our heroine does not age, but whatever star we choose to play her will age.
Oh and of course given my handle I am for a version of E.E. Smith’s Galactic Patrol. Though I fear modern Hollywood would mangle it more than Mr Verhoeven did Starship Troopers. Many of its features (in particular Lenses being MALE only with one special exception) would not sell in the modern world.
A big issue is that a 2-2.5 hour movie requires 200-250 pages of script. a 150 page book EASILY fills that amount of script, but modern Novels run 300-450 pages (And I’m Not even talking to You Mr. Sanderson…). the series/miniseries model doesn’t make as much cash as a successful movie, so it can’t fund as many physical effects (which still are needed for convincing SciFi c.f. Hail Mary Project ). Hollywood has been leery of NEW SciFi with the soft returns on several Star Wars sequels (doesn’t help they were really weak) and the catastrophe that was John Carter, which I thought was a fairly decent rendering of the Barsoom series start (it essentially being A Princess Of Mars reworked a bit). Maybe Hail Mary Projects‘ success will disabuse them of their SciFi fears, at least until they screw some other pooch big time…
TomD:
Every SF book that I’d like to see as cinema combines the elements of imagination, extrapolation, character development and world building. Problem being that doing all that implies a movie too long and convoluted to be doable or effective.
The book that I’d most like to see is Robert Silverberg’s “Lord Valentines Castle” but it would take a Tolkien Trilogy’s worth of effort to do and quite unlikely.
Tregonsee replied to TomD:
Tom D said
“Every SF book that I’d like to see as cinema combines the elements of imagination, extrapolation, character development and world building.”
I think that is true of a great deal of SciFi/Fantasy. For a film or even a series, we like to have a character or two to focus on, both because star power helps sell films and because with a cast of thousands, filming costs go up and engagement goes down. For many years, The Lord of the Rings and Dune were thought unfilmable. Lynch’s Dune and Bakshi’s LOTR nearly proved that true. I Think Peter Jackson did exceptionally well with LOTR and Denis Villeneuve has done well (albeit mangling the timeline a bit and gender swapping a character unnecessarily) with Dune. It helps to have a producer/director/writer that loves and understands the material.
I don’t remember enough of Lord Valentines Castle to be able to comment on it reasonably, but I think you are correct it probably is to obscure and would perhaps feel derivative of other scifi/fantasy. I wonder if we don’t have two separate classes here: films we’d like to see made and films that could be filmed. The latter class has grown with Computer Special effects reducing costs and making some things possible (e.g. an anatomically correct Puppeteer or Kzin is impossible without modern special effects). I wonder how large the Venn diagram of the overlap of those two classes is. And of course there is a third class, interesting to the general public. without being in that class the chance to break even on production costs goes WAY down.
“It! The Terror from Beyond Space” (ITTFBS) is one of those marvelous science fiction movies that are so awful that they can be enjoyed entirely for the camp value. It’s really hard to overstate how cheesy the movie is. And unless you’re a connoisseur of B movie bit players you’ve never heard of the cast. Now, you’ll probably recognize several of them from old tv shows of the time period like “Superman” and “The Twilight Zone” but none of them were movie stars. But they do gamely soldier on with the plot and dialog, such as they are. But when the set is a “space ship” that looks like one room in an industrial building and the “monster” is a guy in a rubber suit you can only do so much.
I won’t warn you about spoilers because you can’t spoil this movie. The dopiness of the “science” defies any concern over spoiling the resolution of the dilemma. It has something to do with the monster having very large lungs from living on Mars and therefore emptying the ship of air will kill the monster faster than if he had smaller lungs! But none of that should be held against this movie. If you watch this movie, you embrace the dopiness.
The plot is basically that the first manned mission to Mars is attacked by a monster that kills eight out of the nine astronauts. A rescue mission is sent to bring back the survivor who is believed to have murdered his shipmates. Of course, the monster stows away by walking into an unlocked entrance and then begins picking off the rescue crew. Once the crew figures out that the survivor was telling the truth about the monster, he seems to become their leader and they combine forces to kill the really hokey looking monster. They try guns, hand grenades, “gas bombs,” electricity and even radiation from their engine. But no soap. Finally, when the monster breaks through the last bulkhead protecting the handful of survivors, they empty the cabin air into space and the monster dies quite dramatically.
So, what makes this movie so special that I don’t pan it. Maybe it’s the two women in the rescue crew. They appear to be nurses who have been sent along to treat victims of the first Mars expedition. They spend most of their scenes holding hands with various crew members and looking soulfully into their eyes while asking them whether the monster is going to eat them all or not. And that’s another great thing about this movie. The monster kills its victims by removing all oxygen and water from their bodies. But since he likes to snack all day long, he drags them around while he’s feeding on them. Then there’s the crew’s space suits. They look like they’re made of wool. And finally, there’s the view of space from the ship. In addition to stars, there are what must be meteors flying by. They look like a few Fourth of July sparklers tied together and pulled along on a string.
So, all in all this is a terrible sci-fi movie by any standard. But for the connoisseur of this sub-genre, it’s a treat. ITTFBS is highly recommended schlock.
I was thinking about trying to start a YouTube channel. But I’m not sure if I can do it the way I want to. My idea is to host an animated version of First Selectman Cthulhu expounding for five minutes about whatever was on my mind that week. So, what this will require is some kind of free animation program that can be used to present the First Selectman speaking with a voice that would be appropriate for his status and personality. It would also be useful if from time to time he could do more than just stand there and talk. Possibly from time to time he could extract a human from a jar on his desk and swallow him. And I’d like to be able to make those humans recognizable images of famous people like politicians, film actors and other pompous asses.
Now I realize this is easier said than done. First of all, I have to develop an interesting persona for Cthulhu. Then I have to be able to produce these videos at least once a week. So that means they can’t take too long to produce and load onto YouTube. Also, I have to learn what rules there are on YouTube that I’m not allowed to break. I’ve seen that there are words like rape and murder that people cannot say on YouTube. I assume that is because using them results in demonetization. Now I wasn’t specifically trying to make money directly from YouTube. I wanted to use it to grow an audience for my writing but maybe demonetization goes hand in hand with throttling visibility so I need to learn all about those aspects of the site. If the restrictions are too limiting, I may not want to bother. After all humor can be kind of cruel and cruel seems to be the mortal sin of the woke generation.
I’m sure this will take a long time to roll out because my plate is already too full now. But I wanted to see if it’s doable. My website has never grown to the point where I can reach thousands of people. So, I figure I should try other platforms to see if I can expand my audience by several orders of magnitude. Obviously, I won’t interest the really largest segments of the population but I have seen where people who are adjacent to things I’m interested in can reach a larger audience. So, I figure I’ll try. Hopefully it will be fun.
Maybe I’ll have Cthulhu interview other supernatural celebrities like Dracula or the ghost of Lindsey Graham. Who knows, my version of Donald Trump might even show up. After all Cthulhu is a Great Old One and Trump is always talking about “great.” Or maybe he can do a cooking show where he shows how to make a jambalaya using Democrat and Republican politicians together. The possibilities are endless. But of course, all of this will be in bad taste so it may never see daylight on YouTube.
I just finished the latest (and possibly the penultimate) Dresden Files novel; “Twelve Months.” So, what should I say about it. I won’t do a synopsis of the plot. You can get that plenty of places but if you haven’t read it, you don’t want the spoilers. And since this is book 18 (or 19 or 20?) of the series you wouldn’t be reading this book if you’re not already caught up on the saga.
So, I think I’ll just give my impressions of the book as a Harry Dresden book. First of all, this book is a reaction to the havoc that the war in the last book “Battle Ground” wreaked on Harry’s life. He lost several close friends and the love of his life so he’s not doing too well. And so, this book chronicles Harry’s recovery from physical, emotional and supernatural wounds that he sustained.
And I would say that this book is much more of an emotional story than most of his earlier books. And that’s not to say that Harry Dresden has just found his humanity in this book. He was always an emotional man but I think the author is trying to emphasize that this older, wiser Harry is less motivated by anger and more willing to use empathy to think his way out of a conflict. He’s even able to reason with a Lovecraftian monster to avoid a lose-lose situation.
And another observation I have is that I think I can see some of the loose ends being tied together. If the next book is the last chapter of the Dresden Files, then he’s going to have to settle the hash of about twenty major characters and a hundred minor ones. And some of these major characters are tied to railroad tracks with locomotives within sight. And there’s no off-ramp for Harry. He’s slowly advanced over the course of the series from an almost comically overmatched novice at magic to one of the top ten powers in the supernatural world. He has friendships, alliances and vendettas with virtually all of the supernatural powers that exist in his crowded and lovingly detailed urban fantasy universe. There is the White Council of Wizards, the Summer Fey, the Winter Fey, Ghouls, Lycanthropes, a Titan, the Black Court Vampires and the White Court Vampires. There aren’t any more Red Court Vampires because Harry killed off the whole clan in an earlier book. How exactly Jim Butcher intends to pull the plug on Harry’s adventures is a complete mystery to me. Killing him off doesn’t seem to make any of the subplots work better and I just don’t see how he “retires.” Too many enormously powerful forces want him dead.
But suffice it to say, if you’ve enjoyed the earlier Dresden Files installments then you will inhale the four hundred sixty odd pages of “Twelve Months” in a couple of days and immediately wonder why Jim Butcher is leaving you hanging waiting for the conclusion. So, who do I recommend this book to? Why, anyone who has gotten this far in the series of course. And for that audience I wholeheartedly recommend it.
So, today Camera Girl asked me whether I had figured out the plot for my sequel to “The Sniper.” I had to confess that my efforts to outline the story had so far been pretty feeble. And this has a lot to do with work and the annoying responsibilities it entails. But I have been thinking of late about a plot line having to do with a very, very wealthy and powerful character (Connors) trying to change drastically the way that Americans live.
And this ties in with the current state of affairs in these United States. It’s apparent that people on the Left and the Right are turning to populist leaders and movements because the American dream doesn’t seem to be working very well lately. Of course, the two sides of the political “binary” would attack the problem in completely different ways. The Mamdani wing would confiscate all wealth and “redistribute” it in a way that would turn the United States into Cuba or worse. But even the Right hasn’t managed to turn America into a capitalist wonderland. Trump has made some moves to try and reverse the off-shoring of American industrial jobs but so far, the results have not been robust in my opinion.
So, I look at this situation and I think that this may be the challenge of our age. And suppose the political parties aren’t up to the challenge. And what if the corporations aren’t interested in being part of the solution. If I want to get dystopian, I can have us descend into a rerun of the end of the Roman Republic with our own Marius, Sulla, Pompey and Caesar. We could run that playbook and end up with an Augustus ushering in the approximately five centuries of American imperial rule by destroying the republic.
But what if I write a more hopeful tale. Not a utopia but a technocratic attempt to find a better way to organize society. Of course, artificial intelligence (AI) is the boogeyman of the day right now and it gets stood up as the cause of and cure for all our problems. So, I can easily be accused of jumping on the bandwagon if I have Connors use some form of AI to help design a different framework for integrating people with an optimal result for the great majority of the population.
Now, I freely admit I haven’t the foggiest idea what that would look like or even if such a thing is even theoretically possible. I wouldn’t want to end up looking like Plato does when someone reads through his “Republic” and the whole thing is a bunch of feeble arguments where he knocks down a bunch of straw men on his way to enthroning “philosopher kings” as his best and brightest ruling over his ant hive of an ancient brave new world.
But I think I would like to play around with this idea of a trillionaire re-ordering society along logical lines to optimize human happiness. So that’s kind of my take on the sequel’s plot. Of course, the first question I’m asking myself is whether the attempt is a success or a failure. I’ll have to roll it around to see which is more interesting. Have patience oh my friend Polemarchus.
Good morning my fellow Dunwichians. I come to you today with a heavy heart but a firm resolve. I’m sure that all of you are aware of the enormous scandal that has unfolded over the allegations that have swirled around my old friend Graham Platner. As you all know he and I go way back to the early days of the oyster farming craze of the twenty teens. After all, as a cephalopod I naturally gravitate to shellfish eating pursuits. And for many years we’ve made the rounds of the New England dive bar circuit. Of course, he was entering them looking for drunk chicks and after he was done I would rip the building from the ground and swallow all of the organic contents. But we were always very chummy. He would show me his death’s head tattoo and I would show him my keychain with the skulls of anybody who didn’t get out of my way that week. But we were always good pals.
But things have gone too far. His disrespect for women has crossed a line. Now, sure, I’ve had my moments of ribaldry with the fairer sex. That time I crashed the Smith College orientation day and ate the whole freshman class in a swimming pool full of barbecue sauce was a bit “forward” of me but I maintained the highest levels of decorum, always keeping my pinky fingers outstretched and never talking while chewing. And I did send an apology to the Dean of Students for neglecting to get a pool pass in advance. But in my heart, I’ve always been a true gentleman and have never disrespected women.
So, it is my sad duty to condemn Graham for his awful behavior and shocking actions. As the political head of the Dunwich Democratic Party, I must take the sad but necessary action of cancelling Graham Platner’s status as keynote speaker at the Dunwich Labor Day Jamboree. And I must further demand the return of all the free passes to the rides and attractions that have already been mailed to him. These passes represent a value of over eleven dollars and are much sought after by patrons of the event. I would hope that Graham would have the decency of mailing the passes in time for their use at the Labor Day festivities. He may have sunk into sexual moral depravity and criminality but at least let’s hope he hasn’t also become a selfish jerk too.
But as much as it is my sad duty to denounce Graham for his outrageous behavior, I feel it’s also necessary to extend the hope of redemption to this lost soul. During the Middle Ages the Church of Rome was famous for their carefully calibrated table of alms linked to indulgences for various terrible sins. In the same vein I’d like to offer Graham the chance to pay alms to Dunwich for the indulgence of his offences. I think three tons of oysters would cover the moral lapses in question quite nicely. If he could convey the alms to my refrigerator by the end of July, I think we could see him attending the Labor Day Jamboree as a “prodigal son” without too much squawking by the gals, in my estimation. Think about it Graham. I’m sure you’ll do the right thing, amigo.
I’ve mentioned the movie “Constantine” tangentially while discussing comic book movies and some other topics that occupied me back a few years ago. This 2005 movie stars Keanu Reeves as a Los Angeles based exorcist and general enemy of demonic forces. He’s a sort of angsty noir character who is angry at heaven since he is doomed to hell because he attempted suicide as a teenager over the horror he experienced as a psychic.
The movie follows a “logic” about the rules in place for angels and demons that makes absolutely no sense but allows for the plot devices that move the story along its arc. And much of the action is plodding and mechanical. And yet I find myself watching this turkey (or parts of it) over and over again. Why?
Well, the two aspects of the movie that stand out in my head are two very different things. The first item is the visualization of Hell. You could say this is just a special effects technique but it really is a rich imagining of the underworld. The idea of Hell as our own world but turned into a burned-out husk makes for a vivid background. And then the demons as these mutilated corpses with the tops of their heads sheared off is bizarrely fitting.
But the second item is, I think, the more compelling. It is the representation of Lucifer during his arrival to harvest the soul of Constantine. As promised in the country song, the devil wears a white suit. As played by Peter Stormare, Lucifer is a witty, amiable fellow who enjoys chatting with his old acquaintance Constantine prior to bringing him back to Hell where he claims he has “a whole theme park full of red delights” for Constantine to “enjoy.” He even helps Constantine light his cigarette when the exorcist can’t manage his lighter because of the cut finger tendons incurred when he slit his own wrists in order to summon up Lucifer. Of course, the devil can’t help pulling the flame away two or three times just for fun. It’s this pettiness and banality that adds interest to the part. It’s contrasted with the menace that shows through whenever Lucifer’s plans are challenged either by demon, angel or divine law itself. But it’s the human face of evil that makes Lucifer compelling. His vindictiveness, cruelty and pride show up as the proof that angels, devils and man are all creations of the same maker. We all have the same stamp. We’ve been given free will and we can use it to reach a higher ground or fall off the mountain.
So that’s why I guess I enjoy watching this silly movie (or at least parts of it). Not for the absurd plot or the goofy take on Christian theology as it relates to Hell. I guess I just like to think about Satan being this provincial, bureaucratic apparatchik fighting with humans and God to protect his turf and cause as much mischief as he can. It just seems to fit what I’ve seen of human nature. At least some of it.
Well, I’ve been having so much fun with the recent science fiction discussions I thought I’d reminisce about the science fiction stories that had the biggest effect on me when I was first starting out reading science fiction. And the one that really impressed me the most early on was Heinlein’s short story collection “The Green Hills of Earth.”
I think it was my introduction to his “Future History” stories. And I remember that reading these stories was different from anything else I had read up to this point. With the space opera stories even as a child I could sense that there was a lot of handwaving going on to justify all the faster than light travel, humanoid aliens and super-duper energy weapons and shields that somehow translated 19th century naval exploration and warfare into interstellar adventure.
His stories attempted to describe the nuts and bolts of building space stations and lunar colonies based on the best information that existed at the time. Some of the stories (about Mars and Venus) were highly inaccurate. But the stories about the Moon are still quite close to what could and maybe will be accomplished. In that vein I think the story that exemplifies Heinlein’s ability to make believable his picture of a lunar human environment is “Gentlemen, Be Seated!” And the plot and characters are both so skillfully sketched that disbelief is completely suspended right through to the end.
Now some of the stories aren’t that believable. “—We Also Walk Dogs” involves a very clever story about a consulting business that accepts the assignment of inventing artificial gravity in order to accommodate aliens from worlds that have both higher and lower gravity than Earth during a conference on Earth. Basically, they bribe a brilliant physicist to accomplish this “simple” task by stealing a museum artifact that he covets. As I said, it’s a ridiculous premise but Heinlein portrays the Machiavellian machinations of this seemingly unlimited consulting firm very skillfully and with great gusto. So that even a story as unbelievable as this one is enjoyed on its own terms.
And that’s the thing with most of these stories. The writing is so skillful that the reader never feels let down by the quality of the stories. The characters are interesting and for the most part believable. The plots are clever and as I said in many cases plausible. And at the time this was far from typical in the stories that could be found on the science fiction shelf in the library or book store.
Here’s a list of the stories that were in that collection. See if any are or were favorites of yours.
“Delilah and the Space Rigger” (1949; originally published in Blue Book)
“Space Jockey” (1947; originally published in The Saturday Evening Post)
“The Long Watch” (1949; originally published in The American Legion Magazine)
“Gentlemen, Be Seated!” (1948; originally published in Argosy Magazine)
“The Black Pits of Luna” (1948; originally published in The Saturday Evening Post)
“It’s Great to Be Back!” (1947; originally published in The Saturday Evening Post)
“—We Also Walk Dogs” (1941; originally published in Astounding Science Fiction)
“Ordeal in Space” (1948; originally published in Town & Country)
“The Green Hills of Earth” (1947; originally published in The Saturday Evening Post)
“Logic of Empire” (1941; originally published in Astounding Science Fiction)
Long ago my wife and daughters found my pronouncements amusing. I codified them in a set of rules (which became referred to as the Rules of Acquisition after the Ferengi rules in ST: Deep Space 9). I have three related to fiction and opinions
16. Opinions are like certain bodily orifices. Critically important but not something decent people expose in public.
17. In fiction (Written, Visual, or Interactive) I desire a story and escape. If I want morals I’ll hear a sermon, if I want to work at something I’ll go to work and get paid for it.
18. This is not to say a writer or other content producer may NOT provide meaning or morals. Just don’t shove it in my face unceasingly (Remember that orifice in rule 16? You wouldn’t shove that in my face either).
And yes Clarke and Asimov are far more of the “Idea” arm of SciFi. Asimov often has to work to make his male characters two dimensional. His female characters rarely rose to that and are almost literally paper cutouts. Clarke uses some stereotypes in his early short stories, but almost all his stories even the Big ones like 2001 , Childhood’s End and Rendevous with Rama depend far more on story (and the first two are reusing parts of several short stories pasted together) than on character. I think it is why Asimov and Clarke excel in the shorter forms (up to about Novella) but struggle more ion the longer forms. This may also stem from the fact that from mid ’40s to mid 60’s the primary form (and most financially viable form) of Scifi was the magizines either as short stories or serialized for longer pieces. These forms make character development harder I would think.
