Courtesy is as much a mark of a gentleman as courage.
Theodore Roosevelt
All the Secrets of the Universe and Some Really Important Stuff Too!
Courtesy is as much a mark of a gentleman as courage.
Theodore Roosevelt
What if you wanted to write a science fiction story about genetic engineering? Now a good example of that is Michael Crichton’s “Jurassic Park.” Here we have geneticists mining dinosaur DNA from mosquitos trapped in amber from the Cretaceous period. And presto-change-o we’ve got tyrannosaurs and ceratopsians running around after Jeff Goldblum while he’s running around after Laura Dern. Isn’t that marvelous. And sure, it is if you’re selling books or movie tickets. But there are a few hitches.
As far as I know there has never been any DNA that has lasted tens of millions of years. Ever. So, no Jurassic Park. But suppose you wanted to write a story about genetic engineering. And suppose you wanted to write it about genetic manipulation of humans. Now you’re talking about science that’s completely possible.
With the advent of techniques like CRISPR (acronym for clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) it has become relatively easy to delete and replace DNA sequences in living cells including germ cells (sperm or egg cells or in the zygote following fertilization). This is reality not science fiction. But what could happen if this technology became widely used is still science fiction, so far. A Chinese scientist named He Jiankui in November 2018 announced that he had created the first human germline genetically edited babies. I think he was sent to prison for the act.
But the point is this is not Jurassic Park. This is technology that exists. And therefore, science fiction can be written about the kinds of worlds that would result if we used this technology. It could be utopian or dystopian or it could be very complicated and involve people’s lives being changed in ways that are neither of the extremes. What if these edited babies live much longer than normal humans? That would create certain problems. Or what if they’re all super geniuses and can’t relate to normal people and their normal hopes and dreams? Either of these scenarios can have consequences that would make interesting stories. Because fundamentally, the interesting thing about science fiction stories isn’t the science but rather its effect on human beings. If scientists bring back dinosaurs but they don’t run amok trying to eat Jeff Goldblum (which really would be fun to watch) no one would care. If the sun explodes but humanity has been extinct for a billion years then no one reading the story would care. The stories are about us and that’s the thing that the writer has to make you understand.
So, I’d really like to read some stories about things that could really happen and maybe even will happen. Maybe a good story would be about someone trying to figure out how to use artificial intelligence to eliminate violent crime or find a way to make democracy work to most people’s satisfaction. There are an endless supply of technological problems and scenarios that already are possible and just need someone to expend a little brain power to make entertaining. And I’m guessing in the not-too-distant future a writer with a bit of skill and a little imagination will write at least one good one.
I’ve reached the halfway point in my marathon of horror and boredom. And honestly, boredom is the deadlier poison. That must be why prison is so horrible. It’s the boredom. Being forced to do nothing for years on end doesn’t sound like the worst thing that can be done to you. And it’s not, but it’s bad enough.
There is magic in being at the half-way point. From then on, it’s downhill. Unfortunately, the last day is like a double portion, so counting hours it’s really not halfway, but the calendar is a more powerful measuring stick. By early Wednesday morning the horror will be over. And so, heading home tonight I had a jaunty smile on my lips and a song in my heart.
When I got home, I looked at the news and it was the same old, same old. Kamala, Tim, Russia, Ukraine, Trump, Vance, Coke and Pepsi. ¡Ay, Chihuahua! Honestly, we’ve got to give this stuff a break. Let the hacks working for the campaigns flood the airwaves with whatever memes they can generate. After all they’re getting paid for it. We need something better.
So, let’s have some entertainment.
Colter Wall has a few very entertaining songs that always cheer me up when I hear them.
This version of the speech I think is the best I’ve seen.
I don’t think I’ve ever found the version of Macbeth’s “Tomorrow” speech I completely enjoy. But this one is the best of what I’ve found.
That’s right. If you have a store in San Francisco, you might get sued for trying to close down or relocate it outside of the city.
Now if I had a business in San Francisco that was only getting by marginally and I heard about this law being debated, wouldn’t I shut it down immediately to protect myself from litigation?
Of course the city could decide to restore law and order and begin prosecuting shoplifters and make the streets safe again for law abiding citizens. But that wouldn’t be progressive.
Good work San Fran. Way to shoot yourself in the foot.
Guy Ritchie’s 2009 version of Sherlock Holmes starring Robert Downey Jr. and Jude Law is one of my favorite “modern” films. The banter between the two leads is as enjoyable as the “case” itself. Here is their investigation going terribly wrong.
Mitch McConnell battles for first place in the rogues’ gallery of useless RINOs that includes Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan and Liz Cheney.
The only catch to this miracle was that we would have to approve the bill without seeing what it said. But then he claimed that this wonderful plan was upended because Donald Trump didn’t want to fix the border until after the election.
“If McConnell had truly believed it would be a grave mistake for Republicans to walk away from the mysterious legislation he helped craft, he would have released it for the public to see how fabulous it was. He didn’t do that because he knows it would have been unacceptable, not to Trump, but to voters.”
McConnell needs to be replaced with an actual American. And since he’s barely alive almost anyone will be an improvement.
How about
The on-line magazine Vox employs someone named Emily Stewart. She describes herself as a “millennial” from a “solid working-class background.” She wrote an article called “You don’t need everything you want. Our expectations around money are all out of whack.”
This is one of a number of articles I’ve seen that are meant to make people think that runaway inflation is perfectly normal and nothing to get upset about or vote a president out of office for. Well, anyway that is the hope. Let’s see how she does.
“I am tired of talking about money. I recognize how that sounds, given that I talk about money for a living. Still, it feels like an inordinate number of conversations I’m involved in lately end up about how much more expensive everything is now (which is true) and how much the economy sucks (which is false) … It’s not that these issues aren’t painful, it’s just that they’re also exhausting. Some of them have simple solutions, too, just not fun ones. You can cook at home. A fancy wedding is not compulsory. Tips are optional, and if you’re that upset over giving the barista a dollar or two, there are cheaper alternatives for your morning coffee.”
So, she “covers business and economics for Vox and writes the newsletter The Big Squeeze, examining the ways ordinary people are being squeezed under capitalism,” but she’s tired of talking about money? What would she prefer to talk about, her horoscope? If we need any clearer indication that the facts don’t support her thesis in this article, I don’t know what that would be.
“Part of the issue is that we seem to have blurred the distinction between a want and a need. Child care and a place to live and a tank of gas to get to work are necessities. The latest iPhone, not so much. On this, some people — and I include myself here — have lost the plot. If you took a European vacation this year, what a delight. Also, it was a privilege, not a right. It’s a choice, too, and one that might make your financial goals later down the line harder to attain.”
Okay so here is the explicit distinction; want and need. European vacation and tank of gas. And that is very clear. What she doesn’t admit is that for the great, great majority of people in this country it’s the “child care and a place to live and a tank of gas” money that has become unattainable. The average person picking this up and reading it will be mumbling curses under his breath and thinking what a clueless prima-donna. She’s taking European vacations and quibbling about how she should feel about it.
“The American economy remains one of abundance. Said abundance isn’t equally distributed, of course, and lots of people really are struggling. But as angry as consumers say they are about the economy, they’re not, on aggregate, changing their spending habits. For many people in the country, life is pretty good. And yet, they often don’t feel that way. No matter how much we’ve attained, we always want more.”
Now this is a crock. I guess under her definition Venezuela is a land of abundance because there are several billionaires living there. Even though the average citizen is trapping sewer rats for his dinner, it’s a land of plenty because there are still plenty of sewer rats. This woman is delusional. They don’t change their spending habits because they spend their money on rent and food and gas. Unless they commit suicide they still need those things.
“I say all of this recognizing that I am in a bubble — I am a millennial living in New York City and surrounded largely by middle- and upper-middle-class people, though many of them don’t see themselves that way. I also say this as someone who is upwardly mobile from a solidly working-class background. If I could tell the child version of myself how things were going to turn out — that I’d be living in a big city, be able to afford to rent an apartment in said city, and have the chance to regularly take trips that involve a plane — she would not believe it. I am aware this is not the case for everyone in my generation or those before or after me. Still, I sometimes catch myself feeling like it’s not enough.”
She got part of it right. She is living in a bubble, an opaque bubble. Apparently, New York City is filled with middle- and upper-middle-class people. I guess I must be missing something when I see the headlines about the illegal immigrant hotels and the homeless encampments. Eric Adams, their mayor, looks pretty shook up about the fiscal meltdown the city is currently going through but apparently La Stewart hasn’t heard about it yet.
“It all feeds into the hedonic treadmill, where we’re constantly chasing down the next dopamine hit but ultimately return to our baseline level of happiness, whatever happens. The pursuit of constant pleasure or fulfillment is enticing, but it’s also not wise — eventually, that Big New Thing just doesn’t have the same kick. Even if we can buy that $40 bottle of wine to have with dinner, it’s genuinely often better to stick to the $15 bottle and keep the pricier option for special occasions. Really good and special experiences in life should be rare, Schwartz said, so they don’t become commonplace and can still deliver satisfaction. (He joked that as far as he knows, “no one on Earth” has ever taken this advice.)”
Ah, so this is her target audience. Affluent White Female Liberals (AWFLs). She is writing to the single middle-aged childless urban cat ladies who need that $40 bottle of wine and “want to see Taylor Swift and Beyoncé live.” She is consoling them about having to vote for Joe Biden despite the fact that that means they will only be able to see “Taylor and Bey” in the movie version of their concerts.
It’s stunning how myopic and self-centered Stewart and her cohort are. Someone who writes on business and economics could look up just how many people are living paycheck to paycheck, at best. People are taking out loans to buy food and pay the rent. These are not times of great abundance, unless you’re an AWFL with a sinecure at one of the New York media properties. Then it’s pretty good.
But there is an audience for this article. And she eventually staked it out pretty clearly. It’s just not people that anyone normal would want to talk to.
Another politician that doesn’t parrot the woke talking points has won a big election Geert Wilders is an anti-immigration politician in the usually complacent Dutch nation. But maybe things are starting to change.
“The far-right and anti-Islam populist Geert Wilders was headed for a landslide parliamentary election victory Wednesday in one of the biggest political upsets in Dutch politics since World War II, and one that is bound to send shock waves through Europe.
The result puts him in line to lead talks to form a new ruling coalition and possibly become the country’s prime minister at a time of political upheaval through much of Europe.
The exit poll published by the national broadcaster NOS said that Wilders’ Party for Freedom won 35 seats in the 150-seat lower house, more than double the 17 he won at the last election.”
Of course as in most countries with a multitude of parties building a coalition government is no easy thing for a right-wing party. But it’s nice to see that the populace is begiining to wake up in the heart of the EU.
Last week I was listening to the Friday morning Power Hour podcast that the ZMan produces. And during the discussion he mentioned that he was surprised when a particular civ-nat pundit who was usually very mainstream normie-con started exhibiting a lot of the talking points that the ZMan associated with the dissident right perspective. I don’t think ZMan was very specific about the exact context and exactly how far to the right this fellow had gone, but I guess the change from the pundit’s usual rhetoric to this new point of view was sufficiently great to merit surprise.
I found this interesting. Usually, ZMan is extremely dismissive of civnattery. He finds their points of view hopelessly naïve and foolish. So, his surprise caught my attention. Now what exactly the details of this change were, I can’t say. But what I assume was that this pundit started using the vocabulary of the dissident right. Maybe he used a term like anti-white racism or just anti-white as a description of someone on the Left or some policy. Something like that might surprise coming from someone who has up until now avoided racialist terminology. Maybe it was a comment about the dishonesty of the establishment Republicans and their phony struggle against the Left’s policies. Or maybe it was an opinion against the war in Ukraine. But whatever it was it’s part of a trend that is no longer possible to ignore. The normies, a lot of them, are waking up.
I have a theory about why the Dissident Right has been at the cutting edge of the awakening on the Right. I think many on the dissident Right have their roots in the blue-collar working class. And that is the segment of White America that was impacted first by the policies and prejudices that the Left and their minions installed during the last fifty years. It was the working class that had a ringside seat for the Great Society upheavals with welfare culture destroying the schools and neighborhoods that they inhabited. And it was the working class that were the first and hardest hit by the off-shoring that went hand in hand with the globalization program of the Left.
And so, the most discerning of the working class were able to express the things they saw and they became the vanguard of the Dissident Right. But now that the whole program of the Left has emerged the white-collar workers and the entrepreneurial community have been impacted and now the intelligentsia. Even leftist journalists can see what’s happening and recognize the Orwellian nature of what’s going on. In that environment it makes sense that even the blindest of normie-con pundits would stumble onto the truth.
Now the funny thing is that even tripping over facts doesn’t mean that unanimity will break out between the Dissident Right and the people to their immediate left. The folks on the Dissident Right talk about a river that they cross that separates them from the rest of the Right. And that difference has more to do with their beliefs about the incompatibility of different ethnicities and races of people. And they see this as part and parcel of the problems that are afflicting this country. And they don’t believe that the possibility exists for different types of people to live together under one set of laws even if it were fairly enforced.
Currently the dissidents and those on the other side of the river just shout back and forth at each other and shake their fists because it’s an academic question. The administrative state, since the 1960s, has used things like affirmative action and other forms of discrimination to stir up animosity between various communities. It’s currently illegal to hire people based only on their individual talents. A quota must be filled regardless of whether qualified applicants can be found based on race and gender. If this ever gets fixed then we could find out if the Dissident Right is correct in their belief that different people can’t coexist amicably. Until then it’s just speculation and we can stay on separate sides of the river pointing at each other and maybe chucking pebbles across from time to time.
Well, Gaetz said he’d do it. He did.
Now we’ll see where this trainwreck of a federal government goes from here.
In a shocking blow to the Uniparty, Speaker McCarthy is ousted! pic.twitter.com/emGo7qdtgC
— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) October 3, 2023