Lately there has been an enormous storm of controversy about AI being used in fiction writing. Recently it came out that a self-published story that became quite popular was subsequently picked up by a major publishing house and re-issued with the full weight and authority of this powerhouse including professional editing and a new cover. But then someone looked closely at the self-published edition and saw that not only was it significantly different from the professionally published edition but that the original was obviously a product of AI. Now, that caused a firestorm and the publisher withdrew the book permanently.
But a cloud of questions swirl around the affair. Surely the editors who revised the self-published edition must have recognized that they were dealing with a product of AI writing. Why would they have purchased this title. It’s assumed the reason was because the book had already found a ready audience and so the motive was monetary. But there are other factors. The authoress Mia Ballard is African American and Native American. In other words, in the world of intersectional identity bingo she was a three-fer! And so, she was exactly the kind of person that Hachette wanted for their imprint. But there still remained the fact that she got a bot to write her story. And that someone blew the whistle on her. Of course, she claimed that it was an editor who added the AI sections and what she had written was her own. Oh boy, that’s gonna be a bunch of lawsuits (or it’s just talk that won’t go anywhere).
Of course, the editors are defending themselves by saying that AI detection programs are far from infallible and so they aren’t to blame. But supposedly the content was pretty obviously terribly written. Of course, that really makes it interesting that the self-published book was such a hit on Goodreads with over four thousand reviews. And that would once again jibe with the idea that the “bio” of the writer was one of the big reasons the book was so popular.
The whole scandal seems to show just what a mess the publishing industry has gotten itself into with identity politics becoming the most important factor by which authors and storylines are selected by big publishing houses for their imprimatur. I guess the same problem is playing out with books that Hollywood is suffering from with their heavy-handed woke propaganda pictures. People are staying away in droves and the monetary losses have finally gotten so severe that they’ve been forced to drop most of the woke plot elements just to lure paying customers back to the theaters.
Well, now that I’ve had a taste of what it’s like to self-publish a book I can say that a large part of the satisfaction in writing a book has to be because the author enjoys his creation. Other than the one in a million phenom that finds the sweet spot in the self-publishing universe everyone else is talking to a small audience and in my opinion the only real failure is if you know that your book isn’t good enough for you yourself to read it for pleasure.
But how soon before AI slop is better than Shakespeare? Ay, there’s the rub.
Sorry OP. You have The Bug, and there is no cure, In The Cat Who Walks Through Walls, Robert Heinlein uses his protagonist’s voice to deliver a blunt truth: writers write because they must, not because they are trained, encouraged, or even rewarded. The quote appears among several reflections on creativity, identity, and the stubbornness of human nature. Two related lines from the same novel reinforce this idea: “There is no way to stop. Writers go on writing long after it becomes financially unnecessary… because it hurts less to write than it does not to write.”“There is no way that… Read more »
Ed, Heinlein’s description of writing is interesting. Of course he had very powerful positive reinforcement at a much younger age than I did. Also I did not feel writing would be a reliable financial model while raising my family. I wanted to write sff because I liked reading sff. I think I like writing it because it’s pleasurable. And I’ve discovered it’s also pleasurable rereading something you’ve written if you think it was well done. As far as being a compulsion, well, a man as lazy as I am can resist compulsions that require him to exert himself either physically… Read more »
Also, in I believe, “The Number of the Beast”, Heinlein predicted AI writing. A sentient computer (not Mike from The Moon is a Harsh Mistress) with mind links to guests wrote for a real author, using his memories and creativity. The author wasn’t pissed, he just said “charge what the market will bear” and that he got half. Stanislaw Lem, in “The Cyberiad” talked of a machine who wrote such wonderful poetry that poets and authors tried to destroy it. Mike in “The Moon is a Harsh Mustress” wrote poetry, limericks, and various subversive literature. Quite effectively, too. As AI… Read more »
It makes sense that they will get better. But maybe human writers will still have some edge. I guess we’ll know soon enough.