I was just reading about the second serious scandal concerning AI generated fiction being published by experts in the world of publishing. In the last scandal Hatchette bought a self-published book because the author managed to attract a very large number of readers on her own. After they republished the book, it was discovered that there was a lot of very obvious AI generated content in it.
In the present scandal a prestigious contest that accepts fiction from amateurs living in the countries of the British Commonwealth had three of the five winners flagged by readers as being AI generated by a capable software used for this function.
Here’s a sample of the text:
“Wilfred’s rum-shop leaned into the road like a rotten tooth. Inside, boards blackened by smoke and sweat, the air sweet with cane and forgetting. Coins meant for rice or kerosene slid across the counter and came back white rum hot as apology. One drink opened the chest, two turned fear into courage’s cheap cousin, three steadied the hand enough to write the future in invisible ink.”
Okay, what the hell does “white rum hot as apology” mean? It doesn’t mean anything. It’s AI slop that it thinks sounds “poetic.”
Now five “Experts” picked this gibberish and declared it worthy of a prestigious award. Why? Well, the only thing I notice that both scandals include are woke publishing “experts” selecting the work of minority writers without bothering to see if it’s any good or even written by human beings.
The most hilarious aspect of the latest scandal is that the contest judges refuse to admit that they’ve been made to look like fools and the stories are still up on their site as the winners.
I watched a YouTube video by a young woman who considers herself a seasoned editor and although she agrees that the text is extremely unlikely not to be AI slop she does add the obligatory warning that we should remember that minority writers must not be singled out as more highly suspect just because they always seem to be the ones whose work slips through the editors who are afraid of being called racists if they look too closely at their work and find it’s not very good.
I guess it’s not enough that the publishing world gives precedence to any writer who isn’t a straight white man. Now they add robots as long as they’re not straight white male robots or at least not working under one of their names. Well, be that as it may, today I officially began work on the sequel to my book. I began the outline by writing out a bunch of plot lines to choose between.
Plot Threads
- Update on Bogey and his life
- Update on Grace and her boys
- President Chastain’s crises
- Constitutional Convention
- Seceding States
- Potential Military Insurrection
- Personal Problems (health)
- Relations with Connors’ Group
- Connors’ crises
- Disaffected Groups with His Organization
- Relations with federal and state officials
- Connors’ indecision and doubts
- Disagreements with Cutter and others
- Personal Problems (Grace, Bogey)
- America’s Crisis of Instability
- World’s Crisis of Instability
- Technical Instability
So that’s a lot of stuff. I’m not sure all of these will be included but it’s always best to start with the kitchen sink and pare it back. Well, take that Chat GPT.
When I read that first line I thought I was reading an entry into the annual Edward Bulwer-Lytton contest for worst opening line.
Whoever these “judges” were, they should have to explain what exactly they thought the meaning of that paragraph was. And if they can’t, they should be drummed out of the English-speaking world and forced to speak French.
Mr Bulwer-Lytton would have gagged at that opening line. The bits and bobs of his stuff I have seen quoted rise to perhaps mediocre. That line is just unmitigated garbage.
It’s very gratifying to see the corrupt DEI driven publishing industry exposed for the buffoons that they are.