The Revolt on the Right is actually a civil rights movement. Nobody frames it that way because the revolt is of the people that every other civil rights movement in this country has been framing as their oppressor. This is the civil rights movement that at its core is straight white men. That is the one identity that has no value in the victim identity rating system. Or rather the value is negative infinity. If you possess the three identity components of male white and straight then you can be passed over for a college spot, a scholarship, for a job, for a promotion, for an award and everyone will say it was the right decision even if you were objectively more qualified.
Now I said it was just straight white men who make up the core of the movement but it is becoming clearer that identity politics can affect other people too. Recent investigations into Ivy League admissions show that Harvard has a policy to limit Asian American applicants even if they are demonstrably more qualified than some of their other favored minority applicants. And the state of women’s sports is beginning to feel the impact of what having actual women compete against so called trans-gender women will mean. Pretty soon the actual women will be completely crowded out of the winner’s circle.
And look at the recent cases of minorities running afoul of the royal flush of identity politics, the LGBTQ hand. Normally being a black man is a pretty strong position when navigating the Hollywood landscape but Kevin Hart saw this credential trumped when he was hounded out of his Academy Awards hosting gig for having said uncomplimentary things about homosexuality in a tweet a number of years ago. And as the final one-upsmanship situation a lesbian recently was shunned by the LGBTQ community for asking the question “How are trans-women different from men?”
But what is happening is an awakening to the fact that straight white men and to various degrees other groups are being discriminated against in the name of fairness. And there isn’t a bit of fairness about it. For decades the people of this country were told that each new identity group needed to be given special consideration to make up for the disparities in wealth or power or acceptance in order to bring the country together. But rather than make the country more united it only stoked resentment and provided an industry in government oversight into every aspect of our lives. School, college, work, housing, social organizations, sports and every business and profession became the target for relentless harassment and micromanagement. At this point we’ve reached the point where freedom of religion has been trampled on to the extent that a wedding cake baker is hounded out of his own business to satisfy the spite of truly evil individuals.
I think Donald Trump’s campaign may be looked back at as the match that set off the powder keg. Awareness of the situation is growing and more and more regular people are recognizing that they are being abused by a system that’s rigged against them and isn’t fair. And they’re starting to realize that they don’t have to take it anymore.
To the mainstream media and the democrats this isn’t a civil rights movement. To them it’s just racist people showing their lack of compassion. But I think it is exactly the civil rights movement needed to bring back into balance the rights of the only people allowed to be trampled on by the identity politics cabal.
The real problem is what to call this movement. All kinds of labels have been circulated. The logic of it is basically Anti-Anti-White. Now, that is a terrible name but the sense of it is there. This is a revolt against reverse discrimination. This is a reaction to the tyranny of the affirmative action regime. This is a push for freedom from the thought police. If I was looking for a symbol that represents the spirit of who is behind this movement, I would take the character in the movie “Falling Down.” A schlub who has been trying to play by the rules all his life and finds that the game is rigged against him.
How about the Falling Down Revolt?
I like this quote last week from Tucker Carlson: “A mob of angry children is suddenly in charge of the country”.
I think Carlson has picked his side and some people think he’d like to be President someday. I know he’d be better than Paul Ryan or Mitt Romney. Would he be really good? Maybe time will tell. At least for now he’s a voice that is speaking out at the risk of his family’s peace of mind.
I read this essay the other day (and your follow-up just now: http://orionscoldfire.com/index.php/2019/01/07/im-the-bad-guy-how-did-that-happen/); it’s brilliant, photog. I’m planning on reblogging/linking to it on my site later in the week. It’s the perfect metaphor. I remember seeing the Bruce Willis remake of _Death Wish_, and it had a similar sort of message: this guy that did everything right was screwed by an elite indifferent to and incapable of addressing a rising tide of criminality and violence. He finally broke and took matters into his own hands. I’m not endorsing vigilantism, but he realized he was a chump. I think (metaphorically) the… Read more »
I’m glad you like it. I also have issues with the vigilantism aspect of it. It’s more the realization of being taken advantage of that seems to apply. But we don’t have to go on some kind of rampage. All we have to do is stop contributing to our own demise, withhold consent.
Here’s the piece I wrote about this essay, photog: https://theportlypolitico.wordpress.com/2019/01/11/reblog-the-falling-down-revolt/
Again, excellent metaphor.
Thanks Tyler. I ‘ll check it out.
[…] political and cultural revolution occurring in the United States now. It’s called “The Falling Down Revolt,” taking its name from the 1993 film Falling Down, starring Michael […]