San Francisco Debates Whether to Sue Stores that Want to Leave

That’s right.  If you have a store in San Francisco, you might get sued for trying to close down or relocate it outside of the city.

Now if I had a business in San Francisco that was only getting by marginally and I heard about this law being debated, wouldn’t I shut it down immediately to protect myself from litigation?

Of course the city could decide to restore law and order and begin prosecuting shoplifters and make the streets safe again for law abiding citizens.  But that wouldn’t be progressive.

Good work San Fran.  Way to shoot yourself in the foot.

 

 

5 1 vote
Article Rating
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Charlemagne
Charlemagne
2 years ago

Another perfect example of Liberal/ Progressive leadership. These people are truly insane.

Bigus Macus
Bigus Macus
2 years ago

It’s not just SF, It’s a problem that most large CA cities are experiencing. I agree with Charlemagne.

War Pig
War Pig
2 years ago

I’ve read that all stores in downtown SF have already closed. If SF sues, counter sue them for failure to protect businesses from organized looting and violent crime. If they want stores open, guard them or pay for their losses to looting.

Chemist
Chemist
2 years ago

If they sue the shop owners for leaving, the shop owners should countersue for failure to enforce the law. In fact, be proactive and sue for your taxes back.

TomD
TomD
2 years ago

Though I don’t remember the rational, I do remember that the state has ruled that if you leave, you’ll still owe Ca state income tax for the foreseeable future.

“You can check out any time you want but you can never leave.” I seem to have heard that somewhere.