Yarvin isn’t thinking about the strategy that brought us to Afghanistan and kept us there for twenty years. He’s thinking of what it means to have a Deep State that would prefer to stay there forever because they want to endlessly expand their influence and scope to include the whole world. Yarvin’s take on what could be done about this boils down to the American people providing the President and his party with a mandate to take a wrecking ball to the executive branch and reconstitute it at a much, much smaller scope.
And who disagrees with that on our side? But how exactly do we get a majority of honest men in the Congress? It seems impossible. I think the only way it happens is if a President declares a state of emergency and using extralegal action fires the whole executive branch and uses the military to keep the government functioning while he rebuilt the government on a sane basis.
It’s nice to talk about draining the swamp but to do it would require an army and a general without fear. Mr. Yarvin needs to provide the plan for how to do something that we all agree needs to be done.