I have not gone to see the new movie “Civil War.” And unless something comes out to convince me otherwise, I won’t be. I watched a bunch of video reviews by people who went to the early IMAX screening. And based on these reviews I understood that the director wanted the audiences to feel that the movie is drawing no comparison between the existing political sides in the United States and the fictional factions that are at war in the movie.
The director wants the audience to think that the movie is about the unstoppable desire of the four journalists to document the war and also about the horrors that would break out in the event of an American Civil War. So that doesn’t sound like a partisan set-up waiting to mug unsuspecting conservatives after they plunk down their hard-earned movie money. But the more I thought about the details of the movie the less convinced I was that this was an even-handed film.
I think the first “tell” I found was the fact that in the movie the dictatorial three term president had disbanded the FBI. Now everyone knows that the FBI is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Obama/Clinton/Biden crime cartel. And that Donald Trump has called for the FBI to be purged and possibly closed down. To me this is the clearest sign that the rogue authoritarian president is meant to be Trump.
The second sign that the civil war is being presented as a battle between the Left and the Right is the scene where a “white” militiaman is pointedly asking the non-white journalist what kind of an American he is. The implication is that at least one of the seceding entities is made up of white nationalists murdering non-whites.
But for me the thing that makes it most likely that I won’t enjoy this movie is the choice of protagonists. The heroes of this drama are intrepid journalists. These pillars of democracy are there to present the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help them CNN. After all, when might we have seen journalists reporting from a war zone with less than the complete truth? Hmmm. Oh, I remember, the fiery, but mostly peaceful George Floyd riots when half of America’s cities were looted and burned. Yeah, that was it! Why wouldn’t I buy into a movie where these paragons of objectivity were the heroes?
Based on the reviews and the statements made by the cast and director they are putting this forward as a completely neutral film. Well, of course they are. Alienating the half of the country that enjoys action movies is a recipe for box office failure for a movie like this. But I’m extremely tired of paying for movies that portray me as what’s wrong with this country. I’ll let someone else pay for that.
And it’s a shame I won’t be going. From what I’ve read and seen, the war sequences are pretty exciting. And they do blow up Washington DC pretty convincingly, which sounds like fun. Maybe I’ll wait until it’s streaming for free or I can rent it from the public library. Oh, and one last thing. The guy who plays the evil president doesn’t look like him but he sounds exactly like Mike Pence. I’m okay if the Western Alliance takes old Mike away for high crimes and misdemeanors. That I’d be okay with.
They lost me at “The western alliance between CA and TX.”
Yeah, apparently in their fantasy Texas has become California. And together they are coming to depose Donald Trump. So somehow Trump is ruling over a rump USA that is mostly made up of the Northeast and Midwest? All those white supremacists in DC and New York? Brilliant. But the Trump character does sound like Mike Pence so that’s kind of fun. I guess I’ll keep my twenty bucks and put it into repair supplies to fix the winter wear and tear on the Compound.
Hollywood? Hero reporters? Alliance between Texas and California?
I’ll pass.
A very wise choice. The producers cleverly advertised this as a movie that would show an America revolting against the present tyranny. But it’s the same old narrative.
”movie that would show an America revolting against the present tyranny” yet they cast the person who most represents the grass roots reaction to that tyranny as the antagonist?
To quote Alice, ” This is getting curiouser and curiouser.”
I think that’s part of why I enjoy writing my own stories. The standard narrative deviates so deliberately from reality that it jars the reader or watcher out of the story and makes it impossible to enjoy watching or reading it.
I just stumbled on Kurt Schlichter’s take on the movie. Thought you might be interested. https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2024/04/18/that-civil-war-movie-is-a-symptom-of-hollywoods-problems-n2637853 … “I saw the new movie “Civil War” so you don’t have to. You’re welcome, and you owe me. Fifteen years ago this month, I started writing for the legendary Andrew Breitbart at Big Hollywood, where we drew attention to the increasing wokeness of Tinseltown. That’s why I saw this movie – to see if Hollywood had learned any lessons. I think it did, but it learned the wrong lessons. … Spoiler alert—it’s a bad movie, and you don’t want to see it. I’m… Read more »
Excellent review. I have to read Schlichter’s novel “People’s Republic.” It looks like a brother to my sniper book.