You are never to lose sight of nature; the instant you do, you are all abroad, at the mercy of every gust of fashion, without knowing or seeing the point to which you ought to steer.
Joshua Reynolds
All the Secrets of the Universe and Some Really Important Stuff Too!
You are never to lose sight of nature; the instant you do, you are all abroad, at the mercy of every gust of fashion, without knowing or seeing the point to which you ought to steer.
Joshua Reynolds
Interesting take.
Well, Trump is definitely disrupting things. The question is can he keep the whole machine from shaking itself apart. Venezuela doesn’t bother me. That’s not even a real country. It’s a mafia neighborhood with a money-printing machine in the basement.
Iran on the other hand is a much bigger and more dangerous neighborhood. Their economy is in tatters and the middle-class is so starved that they dared to face off in the streets against the thugs that Khamenei employs to silence all protestors, with a crow bar. Trump threw in a threat against the mullahs if they start murdering the protestors in the street. And that is his place as leader of the “free world” I guess. But is it just an idle threat? And will these protests really go anywhere?
The last time protests accomplished anything in Iran was 1979 when the Islamists overthrew the Shah of Iran and brought the Ayatollah Khomeini out of exile to begin the Islamic Republic. And that kicked off the Islamic Revolution by holding Americans hostage for over a year. Is it possible that enough Iranians are angry enough to risk torture and death to kick the mullahs out of power and turn Iran back into a modern country? I guess it’s possible but why now?
I read that inflation in Iran is currently at 43%. That is definitely getting close to some kind of breaking point. But standing up to men with machine guns and torture cells takes a lot of guts. I’m far from convinced that anything will come of the Iranian protests. Now maybe it will soften up the regime into cutting a deal with the West. Maybe they’ll agree to end their funding of terrorist groups and in that way begin to have economic sanctions lifted against their oil exports other commercial enterprises.
Now, all of this going on at the same time that Ukraine and Russia are battling to the death may not be a coincidence. Both Venezuela and Iran are Russian allies and trading partners. These situations may be an attempt to destabilize the Russian economy. Sanctions against Russia have been skirted in part by using oil tankers that trade outside of the western countries and this is the same strategy that Iran and Venezuela have used. Perhaps Trump is ratcheting up the pressure on all of these “shadow fleets” to destabilize the economies of all three of these countries.
And maybe it will work. Iran is badly hurting and Russia is beginning to suffer from the combination of sanctions and war fatigue. And Venezuela was a sitting duck for US military and covert attacks. Maybe Trump will get a trifecta of victories. He might even get his Nobel Peace Prize.
But I’ll have to say it’s an exceedingly dangerous game he’s playing. There must be dozens of Iranian sleeper cells that snuck in during Biden’s open border policy. What if the mullahs grow desperate and decide to spread some chaos in the land of the “Great Satan” before they lose control of their own country? I get so tired of these places on the map that are nothing but misery for their own people and anyone that gets involved with them. Donald, be careful.
Poetry operates by raising our curiosity, engaging the mind by degrees to take an interest in the event, keeping that event suspended, and surprising at last with an unexpected catastrophe. The painter’s art is more confined, and has nothing that corresponds with, or perhaps is equivalent to, this power and advantage of leading the mind on, till attention is totally engaged. What is done by Painting, must be done at one blow; curiosity has received at once all the satisfaction it can ever have.
Joshua Reynolds
In the first part of this essay, I stated that the Greeks and Romans utterly failed in their attempt at democratic or even representative government. And that is demonstrably true. Athens lasted less than a lifetime as a democracy and Rome was never anything but an oligarchy masquerading as a popular government. Even when the emperor was the supreme power in the state somehow the plutocrats still got all the laws they needed to bleed the poor dry and prevent any least benefit for the people who made up the bulk of the empire. So, yeah, Rome was a slave camp for everyone but the rich.
But how about us? Have we improved on what the ancients had? Well, we at least have eliminated slavery. That is one absolute advantage. And theoretically we have representative government. In some sense I have a chance of someone who thinks the way I do writing the laws and enforcing them. Okay, there’s something like that going on. After all, look, Donald Trump is president for the second time. He’s even been able to eject large numbers of Deep State ringers out of the federal government. And he’s even been able to primary Republicans who vote against the reforms he’s pushing. He has made some headway toward populist outcomes to some of the worst situations we live under. He has been attempting to reverse unconstitutional laws and rulings like anti-white and anti-male discrimination.
But what we’re seeing is only the first steps. And this is Trump’s last term. Will more progress be made. After all, even under the Roman Republic there were attempted reforms. Tiberius Gracchus was a famous example. He attempted to stop the patricians from robbing poor farmers of their land every time they were forced to fight in a war. While they were in the army their families got into debt just to feed themselves and when they got home the government refused to forgive these debts in gratitude for their military service and these families ended up losing their farms to the greedy moneylenders who added these acres to their already obscenely large landholdings. Gracchus attempted to bring these protections to a vote and was murdered by a mob for his trouble. Interestingly Trump has already dodged two assassins already. When J. D. Vance and the other republicans run for president in 2028, I hope their secret service protection is a lot better than what candidate Trump had in 2024.
So, yes, we have improved somewhat on the fairness of the government we have over the ancients. But many of the same problems haunt us. Graft, influence peddling, complete indifference for the working and middle classes and a bloated bureaucracy that swallows up enormous resources that should go to useful government projects like infrastructure and industrial planning that make it possible for businesses to expand and hire more people.
In the next part I want to look at whether the current method we use for selecting leaders which at least nominally is supposed to be based on Greek and Roman models is really the best method or whether some other structure would be better.
You must have no dependence on your own genius. If you have great talents, industry will improve them; if you have but moderate abilities, industry will supply their deficiency.
Joshua Reynolds
Ancient History is fascinating. Specifically reading about Europe from 600 B.C to 200 A.D. is fascinating. The Greeks, the Romans, the Gauls, the Macedonians, the Germans, the Goths, the Scythians even the Persians all interacting (meaning warring against each other) while trying to figure out how to pass from a barbaric tribal social structure into a larger more sophisticated society. And all this while competing against the more established states like Egypt, Phoenicia and Mesopotamia.
Now some never achieved this. The Gauls and the Scythians ceased to exist as nations while still in the plundering raider stage. The Germans and the Goths had to wait for the downfall of the Roman Empire in the fifth century A.D. before they could advance. The Persians, Greeks, Macedonians and Romans all had their day. The Hellenistic civilization and its several kingdoms and empires had its heyday after Alexander the Great conquered the Persian Empire in the late fourth century B.C. Stretching from western India to Egypt this civilization lasted in various areas until the Parthians and Romans overtook it. The last piece to survive was Egypt which Augustus took charge of after the death of Marc Antony and Cleopatra VII in 30 B.C. Cleopatra was the last of the Ptolemies whose progenitor was one of Alexander the Great’s generals. So, all together the Hellenistic civilization Alexander founded lasted three hundred years. Of course, you could easily make the case that the Byzantine Empire was the extension of this Hellenistic civilization with a thin patina of Roman influence on its surface. And that shrinking “empire” managed to hang on in the city of Constantinople until 1453 A.D.
The Romans had their run from about 600 B.C. to 476 A.D. And they did manage to leave their mark on Europe in a big way. The Romance languages are spoken by a big chunk of the world population and the influence of Roman concepts in law and politics is immense. So, these tribes from the dawn of real civilization in Europe had a great influence on us in the West.
But in a real way their political institutions were all resounding failures at providing their people with good governance, stability or a satisfying life. Both the Greeks and the Romans attempted to create republics that provided the citizens with some say in their government. Athens was a democracy. Rome had popular elections (in a limited fashion) of their leaders. But in both cases these civilizations eventually regressed to some form of monarchy. The Hellenistic states had dynastic kings. Rome had its emperors that were sometimes dynastic but during the most successful eras successors were selected by the reigning Emperor based on merit. And in fact, since essentially the emperor was a military dictator, the legions were the ultimate arbiter of who was a successful emperor. So, Julius Caesar or a Trajan would be beloved by his conquering legions because they would be showered with the spoils of conquest. Whereas, an emperor without any military ability like Caligula or Commodus would end up assassinated by the Praetorian Guard in favor of someone more competent. Perhaps military competency was the basis for picking their head of state. A case could be made for that.
So, the question has to be asked, have we progressed since the ancients? Is our government superior to the Greek and Roman states. Let’s see what I think in Part 2.