Human beings are terrible at governing each other. Admittedly, there have been short periods of time when men have managed to flourish for even a few centuries at a time. But over the long stretch things inevitably break down and human society returns to ugly oppression. The Athenians managed maybe fifty years of decent self-rule under Pericles and his successors. The Romans lost their republic to the greed of their oligarchs and had to settle for the rule of the emperors. But they were a pretty awful lot. Even the five “good emperors” managed about eighty-four years (96 AD to 180 AD) of decent rule. But even during this period most Roman subjects were slaves employed as field hands on the industrial scale agriculture that the rich controlled.
As for ourselves, we’ve done rather better than worse. The last two hundred and fifty years have been less oppressive and freer than almost any time and place in human history. But there were very special circumstances. The rich were so preoccupied with benefitting from the populating of an entire continent that they didn’t have a chance to thoroughly exploit the human beings under their control. And then the industrial revolution made it incredibly lucrative to turn us into mass consumers and so they tolerated the idea of allowing us to be middle class while that process was ongoing. So far, so good.
But both of those conditions have ceased to be ameliorating factors. North America has been parceled out. The money to be made by selling Americans consumer lifestyle improvements like automobiles and washing machines has sort of petered out. Paying Americans to build washing machines has become horribly outdated since Asian labor became a thing. The oligarchs really don’t see much profit in trying to maintain a middle class here anymore. So, I think we’re reaching the end of our exceptionalism. What now?
The way I figure, the usual ending to this story is feudalism. The rich band together and the poor become slaves of one stripe or another. Or worse, our overlords dispense with us altogether. Robots are just so much more efficient and cost effective. Sure, a few human slaves to take care of anything that robots can’t do as well as people but definitely a very small number of living beings. I think that’s what they’re working toward. But can we find a way around that?
Well, one way around it would be to burn it all down. If all the information age infrastructure was destroyed and even the knowledge of it thrown away, well, then we could buy ourselves quite a bit of time. Let’s say we made the integrated circuit a forbidden fruit. Basically 1940s technology only. We’d have to have a law enforcement department whose only job was to maintain the prohibition. And it would have to be worldwide. But for the sake of argument let’s say that the revolution is global in scale. So, mankind decides to throw away automation. Then what? After all, slavery preceded computers by thousands of years. It’s human nature that we’re up against. Well, there you are. Whether we’re eliminated in favor of robotic slaves or just made into slaves ourselves, it is human nature to oppress our fellow men. It’s just who we are.
Of course, there is the old “The Day the Earth Stood Still” angle. Instead of getting rid of computers we could put all-powerful and incorruptible robots in charge of us and allow them to fairly maintain a government for us. Gort would make sure each of us was given a salary to live on and also makes sure we do our assigned work. And with his staggering intellect he’ll make sure that society is arranged so that the whole range of human capabilities is optimally utilized so that everyone is stimulated and no one is abused by the system.
Sounds great, right? Sure, it does, it’s the ideal of socialism but powered by artificial intelligence. Could it be done? I don’t know. But I think we may be about to find out soon. This is what I suspect is lurking around the corner. And in a way, I hope it works. After all, humans don’t want perfection. They just want a solution that is good enough. And maybe our present capability is an AI that’s good enough. We’ll see.