The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance (1962) – A Movie Review

“The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance” is in a lot of ways the last great classic Western.  Directed by John Ford, Jimmy Stewart and John Wayne star with a swarm of excellent supporting cast including Vera Miles, Edmond O’Brien, Andy Devine, John Carradine, Strother Martin and Lee Van Cleef.  But heading up the supporting cast is Lee Marvin as the poisonously evil Liberty Valance.  It is a tale of the closing of the old west when the cattle barons tried to hold onto the open range by standing in the way of statehood in some unnamed mountain western state; possibly Montana or Wyoming.  Here the cowboys are the dead-enders holding off progress and the future is with the farmers and townspeople.

(Spoiler Alert – Skip down to last paragraph to avoid spoilers and read recommendation)

The plot involves the coming to the town of Shinbone of the state’s senior United States Senator Ransom Stoddard (Jimmy Stewart).  He’s come with his wife Hallie to attend the funeral of their old friend Tom Doniphon.  The local newspaper owner wants to know what would bring such an important personage as Stoddard to Shinbone for the funeral of a complete unknown such as Doniphon.  And the whole movie is a flash back to Stoddard’s arrival in Shinbone as a young man and how this changed his and everyone else’s lives.

Ransom is headed into town on a stage coach that is held up by infamous criminal Liberty Valance and his gang.  When Stoddard attempts to stop the thieves from stealing a piece of sentimental jewelry from a widow he is savagely beaten by Valance, ending with a lashing from a whip that Liberty always carries with him.

In the next scene Tom Doniphon brings the seriously injured Stoddard into town on his buckboard for medical attention. Now we meet Hallie who helps treat Stoddard’s wounds.  Meanwhile Stoddard insists that the town marshal Link Appleyard (played by Andy Devine) should arrest Valance for robbery and the assault.  But we discover that Appleyard is too afraid of Valance to even consider arresting the outlaw.  Doniphon explains to Stoddard that the only way to stop Valance is with a gun.  But he also makes it clear that the only one Valance fears is Doniphon himself because of his superior gun hand.  He advises Stoddard to leave town.  We also find out that Hallie is Doniphon’s girl.

The movie moves on to a town meeting to appoint delegates to the state election convention where the representative to the federal government will be selected.  Valance attempts to intimidate the townspeople into selecting him as delegate.  But with Doniphon’s help Stoddard and the owner of the newspaper, Dutton Peabody (played by Edmond O’Brien) are selected.  Valance explicitly tells Stoddard that he is going to come gunning for him that night and Hallie and Doniphon both warn him to leave town.

Valance returns that night and destroys Peabody’s newspaper office and beats him savagely.  Stoddard finds Peabody and calls for the town doctor then gets his gun and heads onto the main street to shoot it out with Valance.  Valance toys with Stoddard.  He fires a shot at a flower pot hanging near Stoddard’s head from a long distance.  Then he shoots Stoddard in his shooting arm, allowing him to recover his gun with his left hand.  Finally, he says, “This one will be right between the eyes.”  Stoddard fires first and Valance is hit and eventually dies.

Now Hallie feels guilty that Stoddard risked his life because of her disapproval of his idea of leaving town.  And it becomes clear that she has shifted her affections from Doniphon to Stoddard.  Doniphon sees this emotional change and goes to his ranch and burns down the home he had been building for his married life with Hallie.

Despite their wounds Stoddard and Peabody attend the meeting at the territory capitol and Stoddard’s name is advanced as a candidate.  John Carradine plays an orator working for the ranchers who characterizes Stoddard as a murderer who does not deserve such a high office.  Stoddard feels guilty for killing Valance and walks out of the meeting.  Doniphon follows him out and confronts him about leaving.  When Stoddard admits his feelings of guilt, Doniphon reveals the truth about the shooting of Valance.  In a flashback scene we witness Doniphon shooting Valance from a side street with his rifle a split second before Stoddard’s ineffective pistol shot was fired.  Relieved to know he hadn’t killed another human being, Stoddard returns to the meeting where he is selected representative.

The movie flashes back to Stoddard telling this story to the newspapermen.  The editor thanks Stoddard but tells him he won’t reveal the truth about who shot Liberty Valance.  He says, “When the legend becomes fact, print the legend.”

Ransom and Hallie leave town after the funeral and it is clear that she still had very deep feelings for Tom.  And they both decide to return from Washington and finish their lives in Shinbone.  The parting shot occurs when a railroad official is complimented by Stoddard on the excellent service he had received on the train.  The man replied, “Nothing is too good for “the man who shot Liberty Valance!”

I will say that this movie was something of a throwback for the year it was made in 1962.  Despite younger stars like Vera Miles, Strother Martin, Lee Van Cleef and Lee Marvin this looked and felt like Golden Age Hollywood western.  The biggest difference was the post-cowboy theme with the ranchers as the bad guys.  And of course, Stewart and Wayne were a little long in the tooth for the characters they were playing during the flashback scenes of the movie.  But I will say this is a very enjoyable film.  I’d say the highlight is watching Lee Marvin getting his comeuppances on the streets of Shinbone.  He does play a satisfying bad guy.  I’ll call this movie highly recommended for anyone who likes a classic western.

Tom’s World – 11FEB2026 – Red Planet Blues

Tom | Flickr

TomD

Getting to and from Mars is easy as long as you have Delta V. You need a velocity of approx. 7 mile/second to break earth orbit and around 20m/s to get to mars and more to match mars orbit. And that’s minimum energy, you’d probably want to double that at minimum to get the total ET down to something humans could handle.

I’ll leave it up to you to calculate the total energy requirement in joules or whatever to accelerate that much mass and fuel to a total Delta V of around 50-60 miles/second and how to do that with chemical reactions.

We got Voyager out of the solar system and up to 25-30 miles/second total energy but that’s when you have years to hop from planet to planet sling shotting around each to gain velocity.

Practical Mars will have to wait on fission at minimum or fusion and you still need reaction mass.

The moon is cool.

Back in the Apollo days of the early 70’s, I met a couple of students from U of Wisconsin on sabbatical traveling around the country and working odd jobs for cash. They were only here (Atlanta) for a couple of months before moving on and we got along save several heated debates on the Apollo program. It was their position that Apollo and all similar projects be immediately defunded until human perfection was achieved, though they didn’t state it in such stark terms, the implication was such had they the desire and ability to extrapolate. Even at the time I knew that was absurd and the purest fairyland fantasy because that condition would never be met and the net effect would be to condemn the planet to the darkness. It was my 1st exposure to hard-hard idealistic leftism. I had already left the Marine Corps but that train of thought and logic not common there then or now, I suspect.

The Danger of “Best Of” Lists

Recently I went on-line and found a best twenty-five modern science fiction movies list.  And I went through it and found half a dozen movies I hadn’t seen.  And I gave the list to Camera Girl and told her to submit it to her friend the local librarian to get me the DVDs through interlibrary loan.  Well, the only movie they had the first day was “Children of Men.”  Last night we watched it.  Oh boy.

I knew that it was a dystopian alternate history movie where humanity become completely infertile.  What I didn’t know was that with the exception of Michael Caine I would hate everyone in the movie.  It takes place around London in the year 2027, I think.  London is stewing in a smoldering revolt by the illegal immigrants that are being deported.  The plot revolves around a pro-immigrant terrorist group that has found an immigrant girl who is pregnant and the attempt to assist her to escape to an international group called the Human Project that intends to cure the world’s infertility.

I won’t go into a lot of detail because this isn’t a review.  It’s just a rant.  Clive Owen, Julianne Moore and Chiwetel Ejiofor play main characters and I found myself disliking them ever more deeply throughout the movie.  Basically, this is a pro-immigrant, anti-western civilization diatribe with environmental hand-wringing thrown in for good measure.  And the whole film is ugly, brutal and depressing from start to finish.  When it was over I apologized to Camera Girl for not shutting it off after the first five minutes.  As I mentioned I liked Michael Caine’s character.  He’s an old hippie-stoner which isn’t great but it is Michael Caine so he makes him lovable.  But that’s hardly a good reason to watch this mess.

Well, I guess I should go back to that list and get a better idea what the rest of the movies are really going to be like.  If the guy who made this list thought this was a good movie, then his judgement is certainly suspect from my point of view.  You know, if all of a sudden, every woman on Earth became infertile, I’m guessing that all of the biologists in the world would be working on that problem night and day and I’m pretty sure they’d at least figure out what the cause was.  In the movie they don’t even know that.  This alternate history is so depressingly bleak that I can’t see why anyone would make this movie.  I’m left with the idea that this was some kind of moral lesson to let us know that not treating illegal immigrants like members of the family is so evil that Gaia will punish us by making us sterile and wiping us off the planet.  That isn’t science fiction.  That’s propaganda to make the Left feels virtuous.  The only part of the movie that I liked was at the end where the protagonists are leaving a battleground where the immigrants are battling the British Army and suddenly a few fighter jets go overhead and rain down death and destruction on the immigrants.  I think I gave out a little cheer.

Guest Contributor – Tregonsee – 10FEB2026 – The Lunar Option

And now he should change his name to D. D. Harriman. I’ve also always felt the Moon was a better choice. Mostly because with basic chemical rockets, it’s 3-5 days away and there are LOTS of windows to reach it. Mars is 140+ days, and that window is only roughly every two years. If you have a small initial Mars colony, no matter how many ships you have and the Stuff hits the fan, you’re on your own for on average 18 months away from outside help. With Luna its 3-5 days depending on lunar phase and you may be able just to lifeboat back to earth orbit.

Looking the 140 day or so timeline is like the early Europe to American colonies distance from Europe and America had air and food and water. And yet we still had Roanoke and lost 1/2 of Plimouth Colony the first year. Luna lets you learn in a slightly harsher environment with at least some safety net. Mars really has to wait until there are constant thrust engines (be they Nuclear Thermal, Fission/fusion pulsed or straight up fusion) so we can have .01 or .1 g constant and not have to use Hohmann (minimal energy) orbits and have 14 or 4 day transits to Mars/ Nearly every thing Elon (pardon me Delos) had planned for Mars is useful on the moon and can be further refined for future Mars work.

Also, if we’re going to do this, it should be done as G*d, Von Braun and Arthur C. Clarke intended with an orbital station to fuel lunar Starship-like beasts and send them on to the moon. We need the infrastructure. Maybe not immediately but once we try to start moving large quantities back and forth. the division of labor would help.

Elon Musk Bows to the Scientific and Economic Wisdom of photog and Pivots to Luna City Goal

Last June I wrote a post called Moon Mining in which I made a lot of hyperbolic statements about my future as a miner of precious metals on the Moon.  But in a more serious vein (no pun intended?) I said, “But seriously, I think there is a lot more likelihood of the Moon becoming economically useful to humans than Mars.  The difference in distance alone makes Mars almost impossibly difficult for manned flights.

The Moon on the other hand was reached more than fifty-five years ago by men whose technological capabilities were rudimentary compared to what we have at our disposal today.  Imagine what improvements modern computing power and automation could do to make reaching and working on the Moon safer and easier.”

And then there’s this post from last week, “It’s Shiny and New” where I talk about Luna City.

And here we are a few days later and this headline appears:

In a reversal, SpaceX prioritizes ‘city’ on the moon over Mars project, Musk says

In the article it says, “Elon Musk said on Sunday that SpaceX has shifted its focus to building a “self‑growing city” on the moon, which could be achieved in less than 10 years.

SpaceX still intends to start on Musk’s long-held ambition of a city on Mars within five to seven years, he wrote on his X social media platform, “but the overriding priority is securing the future of civilization and the Moon is faster.”

What else do I need to say.  Elon, there’s no shame in admitting you’re wrong when someone gently reminds you that wisdom is still a higher authority than Midas-like wealth.  Well, he’s still relatively young and there’s time for him to learn what’s really important, namely building Luna City and naming the main street Neil Armstrong Blvd.

Seriously, I was starting to doubt whether he wasn’t just blowing smoke with all the Mars mission talk.  That stuff is a generation away.  Building and maintaining a permanent Moon base is an achievable goal that will show us whether human habitation beyond the Earth is feasible and profitable.  If it isn’t it’s better to learn that from a place where retreat takes a couple of days rather than a year.  Trillions of dollars and, more importantly, lives would be saved.

So, get going Mr. Musk.  Sell the boys in Washington a plan to build something like a town on the Moon.  You’ll make a whole lot of money and you’ll spark the imagination of a generation of boys whose grandfathers thrilled to the Apollo landings.  Just make sure you do a good job on the accounting so it won’t come back to haunt you when the Democrats come back into power.  They’re a vindictive bunch and they love to punish people whom they hate and from everything I’ve read they hate you now even more than they hate people like me.  And that’s a whole lot of hate anyway you stack it.

I have to confess I’m actually kind of excited to hear this goal.  I think he can get this done.  I’m guessing Trump would like to have his name involved in it too.  That quite a combination.