I won’t give a synopsis of the plot. If you’ve seen the movie “Blade Runner” then you have an approximate idea of the world and the action of the story. Rick Deckard is a bounty hunter who kills androids that break free of their service as bond slaves for humanity on Mars. He lives on an Earth where a remnant of humans remain who haven’t emigrated off-Earth. The Earth is contaminated with radioactive fallout called “the dust’ that is slowly mutating and killing every living thing. And many species have gone extinct and there is an almost cult-like love for animals that is expressed by owning farm animals like sheep and goats. And the extension of this cult is something called Mercerism that expresses empathy for all living things (except androids).
Let me give my impressions of Philip K. Dick’s writing and style. He is a very effective writer. His characters are sparingly but clearly represented and his narrative is interesting and cleverly crafted. He has carefully thought out many details of how this strange world works. The interpersonal interactions between Deckard and his wife, his boss, the androids, the other people in his surroundings are all consistent and keep you immersed in the story. He is a very talented science fiction writer. And if this book is representative of his type of story, he is not for me.
If I would sum up this book in one word it would be “dystopia.”
Everything in this book is downbeat. Deckard is depressed. His wife is practically suicidal. His boss is bleak. The owner of the corporation that makes the androids is harried. And finally, the androids are schizophrenic. The only ones who seem cheerful are the tv comics meant to sedate the populace and the pet salesmen who sell overpriced animals and fake animals to the desperate remnant of Earth’s human population.
So, here’s the thing. I think PKD is a major talent and I’m sure his reputation as a talented author is well deserved. And I’m sure there is a large audience for his type of fiction. Unfortunately, I’m not a part of that audience. I’m not a hopeless dystopia kind of guy. That doesn’t mean I need utopia. I don’t mind crises and catastrophes. But a story that has absolutely no one to root for just doesn’t inspire me to keep reading. If everyone in the story is a neurotic basket case and no one can summon the will to try and overcome the awful things that are happening in the story; or if morally speaking, the “good guys” are completely indistinguishable from the “bad guys” then why the hell should I care who wins or loses?
So, yeah, this is a good book. But it’s not for me. I’ll probably read a few more PKD “masterpieces” to see if there’s anything for me. If they’re all like this then I’m going to assume that the author was an extremely unhappy man and if I don’t want to end up that way myself, I should move on to greener sf pastures.
