Guest Contributor – The Portly Politico – 03JUL2024 – Sid Meier’s Civilization Series Review

 

Sid Meier’s Civilization Series Review

I decided to become a history teacher in the tenth grade after giving a presentation in an English class about water transportation in nineteenth-century America.  Why I was giving such a presentation in English is unclear–we were probably talking about Mark Twain–but that presentation gave me the teaching bug (and, apparently, a lifelong vow of poverty).

Even before that, though, history had captured my young imagination.  I grew up poring over atlases, textbooks, books, almanacs, encyclopedias, etc.  Part of what sparked this youthful interest was, of all things, video games, specifically the classic Sid Meier game Colonization, in which players colonized the New World and, ultimately, fought for independence.

Colonization, sadly, did not evolve significantly further as a series.  However, its inspiration, Civilization, now spans six installments, with a seventh on the way.  I vividly remember playing Civilization II on a cousin’s computer sometime in the 1990s, and I was hooked.  The first time I plopped a settler on a rickety trireme and dropped him successfully on a far-flung continent, I knew this was the game for me.

All of the Civilization games fall into the “4X” genre, in which players eXplore, eXpand, eXploit, and eXterminate (I suppose they could be called “4E” games, but that doesn’t sound quite as cool, does it?).  While not all Civilization games are created equal, each brought new innovations to the series that have, overall, improved and deepened the experience, while still being very accessible to new players.

My first exposure was to Civilization II, which I then received from my aunt that Christmas; I spent the rest of the day reading the 200-plus-page manual.  Civilization, the original installment, was already dated by that point, but I picked up a copy of its online-enabled version, CivNet, on a band trip in high school.  My neighborhood friend and I spent many hours playing “hotseat” games of CivNet, which had players taking turns at the same computer.  Later, that same friend and I would play hotseat for years in college (usually via e-mail) on Civilization III.

Civilization II is the best of the “classic” era Civ games.  It included a number of graphical and gameplay improvements over its predecessor.  Civilization III is, perhaps, one of the weakest entries in the series, suffering from a number of balance and performance issues.  However, it introduced a number of intriguing gameplay elements, like cultural borders and the need to negotiate “rights of passage” treaties to traverse another civilization’s territory.

The series entered the modern era of gaming with Civilization IV, which featured a brighter and more cartoon-y color palette.  It preserved the cultural borders mechanic of Civ III while also introducing religions to the game for the first time.  That has become a staple of the series, and there are few things more satisfying than converting the entire world to your religion (one of the several ways players can win the game).  I’ll never forget converting the entire world to Judaism in my first game of Civ IV, playing as the Americans.  There is, perhaps, something oddly prophetic about that.

Civ V brought an Art Deco aesthetic to the games, and shifted away from a square-based grid to hexes.  That changed military combat substantially; no longer could players create massive stacks of units that could grind a city into dust in a turn.  Instead, only one military unit could occupy a hex at a time, making conquest of cities more protracted and strategic in nature.  Terrain, which had always modified defensive bonuses based on the type (for example, a unit defending on a hill enjoyed a defensive advantage versus a unit defending on a flat plain), now became even more important.

It feels as though Civ V barely got its footing before the exquisite Civilization VI hit the scene.  This latest iteration included many of the elements of prior Civ games, but true to the series, it slowly ladled out key mechanics across two expansions–a particularly annoying but lucrative business model that has plagued almost every version of the game.  Regardless, Civilization VI and its expansions introduced, among other elements, climate change, which players can contribute to and/or mitigate through various means, and which gradually changes the map.  To be fair, Civilization II introduced “global warming,” which could have horrendous effects on the map, but Civilization VI approaches it in a more elegant and nuanced way.

Now with Civilization VII on the horizon, fans of the series are clamouring for more.  But which is the best?

In my assessment, Civilization II is the best of the “classic” era of the game.  Compared to modern versions it is quite basic, but there is something about its color palette and its gameplay that are timeless.  Civilization III struggled with various bugs, but I also enjoyed sinking hours of my life into it.

In the modern area, Civilization VI takes the cake for me, although its two predecessors were excellent games in their own right.

Usually, newer does not equal better, but in the case of the Civilization franchise, it does seem that player suggestions are implemented more thoroughly, and the games become more interesting and refined through each generation.  That is a positive legacy of the series, and one that will hopefully continue with Civilization VII.

 

Tighten Your Belt

I was having a discussion with a younger family member.  Someone of my children’s generation.  And we were talking about how children need to be brought up at this point.  Now this guy is a very impressive individual.  He actually embodies all the of the characteristics that people make believe they have when they describe themselves in their resumes.

What he says he’s doing with his sons is making them ready to survive in a very bad economic environment.  He’s a strong believer in the, “Hard times leads to hard men leads to easy times leads to soft men leads to hard times” theory.  He wants his sons prepared to face adversity because he is of the opinion we haven’t even begun to see the bottom.  And I think he’s right.  Even in the challenging environment we are experiencing we haven’t seen anything like what’s to come.  The powers that be are working to pull the supports out from what used to be the American way of life.

The “great contraction” seems to be the plan to produce a step change in the number of people in the world.  I’m guessing they’d like to go from billions of people down to hundreds or maybe even just tens of millions.  And the way to get there is to remove the ability of average people to be gainfully employed and able to raise a family.  Essentially, they only want their class to continue forward.  And I think they’re succeeding.  Young people no longer believe it is possible to provide a middle-class existence for themselves, never mind for a family.

A family-based strategy seems to be the only way to overcome the reduction in opportunities and resources that is going on.  If kids can’t afford a house, then they’ll have to be housed by their families with their wives and kids in the family home.  Building an addition or trading in the family home for a multi-family building will once again become the way to allow the kids to afford family life.

Now, to some people this seems unacceptable.  Well, then maybe seeing your family end with your kids unmarried and without children of their own is the acceptable solution.  That’s a personal choice.  I guess if you are exceptionally wealthy you can buy them houses.  But then you probably already belong to the class that is supposed to emerge from the contraction; the elite.

For everyone else, surviving the new normal will involve tightening our belts and working twice as hard for half as much.  And maybe this is something that really has to happen.  Maybe the elites really are right and the good times are permanently over.  Personally, I don’t believe that.  Human ingenuity is an enormously powerful force.  Technological solutions exist for all of the “end of affluence” factors; energy limits, Malthusian population predictions, climate change panic.  I think that hard times are not a permanent situation for us today.  Rather I think a mindset by the global elites fosters the idea that Gaia needs our grandchildren to be sacrificed on the altar of depopulation.

I think we are headed for hard times.  Regardless of who wins the election in 2024, prepare to do what you can to help your loved ones to make it in very hard times.  It’s on the way.

Trump is a Point Ahead of Biden in New Jersey

New Jersey is a blue state.  If Trump is currently polling slightly ahead of Biden (41 – 40) I think that should be a blinking red danger signal for the Democrats.  We may be witnessing a major shift in the American public’s political calculus.  Maybe it’s as simple as “It’s the economy stupid.”

Update:

TomD replied,

I thing the major headline should be Trump is only a point ahead, indicating the major league accumulation of negatives he has as ballast. I think that 80%+ of this ballast is the result of the unceasing histrionic media wide attack he has been undergoing since 2016. Repeat a lie often enough——

But the fact is that his image has been largely and permanently poisoned for close to 50% of the population. I know several people who just hate Trump. Question them as to why and you get nothing substantial, just blanket statements like, “Trump lies”. Push deeper about the specific lies and they don’t have anything. If they do have a specific “lie”, it typically an example of hyperbole, or exaggeration for effect. There is a huge and substantial difference in a fundamental lie like hiding Biden’s inability to perform the functions of his office and “I had the greatest economy in history”.

Chemist replied to TomD:

Tom, I have had this discussion with too many people. None of them can give a specific example of a “Trump lie”. So I went a different way. I point out some of Biden’s more egregious lies and actions. If the conversation is in person, I will stop at one or two. If an email, they get the whole list. Here is the list. Feel free to pile on:

Biden avowed that no one is above the law.
Biden then bought votes by ignoring the supreme court and “Forgiving” billions of dollars in student loans – but Trump lies.
 
Biden used the power of the vice presidency to get a Ukrainian prosecutor fired (thereby protecting his corrupt son Hunter) – but Trump lies.

Joe Biden had an affair with a married woman (Jill Stevenson) and destroyed their marriage – but Trump lies.
 
The latest “brilliant” appointment to the Supreme Court doesn’t know what a woman is – but Trump lies.

Children are sexually groomed by teachers and if you object they’ll take your child from you – but Trump lies.
 
Biden showered with his teenage daughter – but Trump lies.

 

Order in the Court

The Supreme Court has been on a tear lately.  But their decision to provide absolute immunity to a president while acting in an official capacity is a bold move.  It has the Left calling for the impeachment of the Justices.  Dementia Joe popped a couple of Adderall and gave a five-minute teleprompter speech to the White House press gang.  And AOC has sworn vengeance against the conservative majority with a threat to bring up impeachment proceedings against them.  Of course, the Democrats don’t have a majority in the House so that motion will never see the light of day.  But she wants everyone to know she’s really, really mad.  And we can tell because she went through one of her TikTok routines where she flipped her hair a bunch of times, jostled her breasts and wagged her head and index finger in opposite direction and said “Don’t go there!” several times.

So, the question is does anyone in the real-world care?  Well, actually no.  How is anyone supposed to take anything in Washington seriously anymore?  Apparently, the leader of the free world has to be led around by a nurse to keep from falling over and breaking a hip.  And whoever writes his teleprompter text is running the country that day.  And when Doctor Jill is resting that’s probably delegated to one of the White House interns named Madison.

But I’ll have to say that I am pleasantly surprised to see how many helpful rulings they’ve put out in the last couple of years.  College Affirmative Action, the Chevron Deference, Roe v. Wade, Freedom of Religion have all been adjudicated in helpful ways.  Granted their record hasn’t been spotless but their batting average is very respectable.  The biggest decision I’m waiting for is an outright ban on Affirmative Action by the federal government.  That would have far-reaching effects and would neutralize much of the harm that the Deep State causes in this country.

But there is one thing that shouldn’t be forgotten.  The Supreme Court conservative majority is a temporary artifact of the Trump presidency and some random occurrences like the death of Ruth Bader Ginsberg.  If the Democrats keep the White House in November, it won’t be long before that majority is reduced or even lost.  Both Alito and Thomas are older and one day will have to be replaced.  For that reason, it’s important to make provisions for living in a post Constitutional order.  When constitutional rights have ceased to exist, planning and protective measures will be needed to prevent life from becoming degraded.

But in the short term it has been refreshing to hear the Left squealing like stuck pigs every time a Supreme Court decision is announced.  I chuckled when AOC went to her go-to term, “fascism” when describing the inevitable result if Donald Trump regains the White House and “absolute immunity” is at his disposal.  Now I sympathize with her.  I believe AOC claims she was almost murdered during the January 6th “insurrection.”  And I’m sure that was rough.  But I think she’s safe from murder.  Maybe not mockery, but murder doesn’t seem likely.  And with his absolute immunity I can imagine Trump mocking her mercilessly.  Fascism!  But funny fascism.