As far as fidelity is concerned, there is no animal in the world as treacherous as man.
Michel de Montaigne
All the Secrets of the Universe and Some Really Important Stuff Too!
As far as fidelity is concerned, there is no animal in the world as treacherous as man.
Michel de Montaigne
As a former student of classical languages and literature I suppose I should be categorically opposed to this movie. But to be honest I probably enjoyed around three quarters of it.
(Spoiler Alert – Skip down to last paragraph to avoid spoilers and read recommendation)
Now full disclosure, the movie Troy resembles Homer’s Iliad about as closely as my grandson’s middle school band’s rendition of the Blue Danube Waltz resembles that performed by the Berlin Philharmonic. In other words, not a lot.
But that really isn’t important. The question is whether it succeeds on its own terms. What we’re presented with is an adventure film masquerading as a literary epic. We have the story of Orlando Bloom as Paris absconding with Menelaus’ wife Helen from Sparta and taking her to Troy where her new father-in-law Peter O’Toole as Priam decides that they’ll defy Agamemnon and try to keep Helen even if Brad Pitt as Achilles is preparing to run amok on the windy plains of Troy.
In order to turn an epic poem into a two-hour movie some compromise had to be taken with the plot. Instead of a ten-year war we have a ten-day war. And some folks had to be sacrificed. For instance, both Menelaus and Ajax are axed in the second day of battle. Now that is surprising since in the Hellenic version Menelaus is one of the few heroes to reach a ripe old age after the war. And equally surprising, not only does Paris survive but he ends up keeping Helen. Shocker!
So, you might ask what does survive the translation from page to screen? Well, I’d say Agamemnon, Odysseus, Achilles, Priam and Hector are recognizably themselves. Agamemnon is an arrogant fool. Odysseus is the wily survivor and Achilles is the aristocratic demi-god following his doom. Priam is the honorable king who must see his country and family laid waste. But the most sympathetic character is of course Hector. Here is the good man, prince, husband, son, brother and father trying to save his country from a creature that no man can defeat. It is his fate to kill the cousin of the monster and now have to face him in single combat. And he will die and his body will be lashed to the back of Achilles chariot and dragged around the plains of Troy in ignominy. And this gives his father the chance to beg Achilles mercy to allow for decent burial.
So quite a bit of the story survives. We even get the Trojan horse scene, which truth be told isn’t part of the Iliad. It’s more of an aside in a story in the Odyssey.
As you can imagine, the whole thing is sort of a hot mess. To his credit I think Brad Pitt acquits himself quite skillfully in his characterization of Achilles. His relation to the primary and secondary characters is consistent and generally very entertaining. Unfortunately, all of this relatively positive film making falls apart in the last scene. The sack of Troy is highly unsatisfactory. The death of Achilles seems to fall flat and lacks emotional interest.
So, who, if anyone, can I recommend this movie to? Well, to start with Brad Pitt fans might want to give it a watch. I’d say fans of sword and sandals epics might like it. Strict devotees of Homer will be affronted and may throw things at the screen. My opinion is that it is relatively entertaining with some weak scenes and an unsatisfying ending. Of course, your milage may vary.
Man is certainly crazy. He could not make a mite, and he makes gods by the dozen.
Michel de Montaigne
Here’s a very interesting discussion of Levinthal’s paradox. In a nutshell, the paradox is related to the almost infinite possibilities in the ways that a macromolecular protein can fold into its primary, secondary and tertiary shape versus the effortless way that proteins function in living thing. The author says the degrees of freedom inherent in a large protein molecule have been modelled and there are supposed to be 10300 different shapes that the protein could assume. Now the point is that this number is so absurdly large that the chance of any particular protein molecule assuming the shape it needs in order to perform its biochemical function in a living cell within a short enough time to sustain the metabolic requirements of life seems impossible.
Well I must admit that is a ridiculously large number. Someone did a guess at how many separate atoms there are in the observable universe and he came up with 1082. So that gives you a feel for the absurdity of 10300 .
Basically this argument is supposed to demonstrate the unlikeliness of the genesis of life occurring again elsewhere in the universe.
I guess I’m not sure what I think of this. While the large size of macromolecules render their physical properties subtle and hard to predict, nevertheless, they do possess these properties and these are exactly the properties needed to sustain life in the world we live in.
If they occur on Earth then they could occur elsewhere. Now the point really is how could life occur in the first place if the exact sequence of amino acids and nucleic acids needed to make up the macromolecules of life are so absurdly complicated and the random forces involved in creating these exact molecules would be so blind?
It seems what the paradox is hinting at is God. Well, I won’t argue with that.

And the rolling year has once again brought us back to that most equivocal of fake holidays, “Father’s Day.” When I say fake, I mean that it’s a manufactured occasion that has no long history of celebration. Its equivocal nature is owed to the mixed feelings that everyone in a family feels about dear old Dad. Well, at least that’s my own point of view.
And this is based on my own father and the way he raised his six sons. Basically, it was like some kind of anthropological experiment that was started out with the best of intentions but then went horribly off the rails and eventually completely overwhelmed the investigators and had to be recast as a cautionary tale for all involved.
A more beleaguered man has never walked the face of the Earth. He was always outnumbered, outgunned, behind the times, short of resources and out of patience. I don’t remember him getting through a single day in that house without screaming and hollering at several or all of us. We were terrible kids.
We broke everything he owned. We lost every tool he possessed and we caused at least one disaster a week. His house was perpetually on the edge of crumbling into something resembling the debris piles seen in old footage of London after the Blitz. When leaks would develop in the house’s flat roof his solution was to use a hand drill on the ceiling to direct the leak and put a bucket under it. His idea was that by tapping the leak it would prevent it from soaking the whole plaster ceiling and have it collapse onto us while we were sleeping.
He had a steam heat system which perpetually leaked at all of the radiators. And he battled this problem by attempting to use string and grease to seal the threads of the pipe joints. But the threads were so stripped that this never accomplished much of anything. But he soldiered on with the hope that one day he’d catch up with his expenses and have a plumber come in and replace it all. Finally, the ceiling in the living room underneath the leakiest radiator on the second floor collapsed. All the plaster crashed down on the living room floor and exposed the wooden laths in the ceiling. One of my younger brothers was overjoyed and he said aloud, “This will finally force him to fix the ceiling once and for all.” Well, no. That ceiling remained in that condition until after my father’s death a number of years later.
So, my example of fatherhood was definitely idiosyncratic. And as for Father’s Day, if my father could have had his wish on that day, it would have been to lock us all out of the house for the whole day and leave him alone to watch baseball, horse racing and boxing on his tiny, pathetic, black and white, constantly drifting television set. But that was an impossibility. We were an omnipresent reminder of his status as Dad.
So, on Father’s Day he often fell back on his only real domestic skill. He could make pancakes and French toast by the imperial ton. And in that house, he had to. He bought the cheapest pancake mix and syrup he could find in bulk containers. I always imagined that he got it from war surplus. And when pancake day arrived, he’d cover all the burners on the stove with griddles and he would cook and we would eat stacks of pancakes until we couldn’t move. It was probably the high point of our lives together. For that brief time, we were all happy simultaneously and we were all well fed which rarely otherwise occurred.
So maybe Father’s Day should be like that. A day when Dad should find something he knows he can do that makes the whole family admit that he’s good for something other than paying the bills. Anyway, it’s a thought.
Orion’s Cold Fire (OCF) reports on the decision of OCF Coffeehouses (Coincidence? I think not!) to close down rather than negotiate with unionizing employees on their wage demands.
When informed of management’s decision to cease propping up the marginal businesses, one exceptionally large and well pierced barista was heard to wail, “They can do that? What the hell were we thinking?”
When asked to comment from his secret base in the caldera of an extinct volcano on the whole tawdry affair photog was heard to say, “Huh?”
To an atheist all writings tend to atheism: he corrupts the most innocent matter with his own venom.
Michel de Montaigne