Men and women are fundamentally different. We interact with the world and each other in different ways. We have different takes on almost everything. Probably God will have to provide two different versions of heaven; one for men and one for women. But the confusing aspect is how men and women (for example a husband and wife) will get to see each other in the afterlife. Will we be separated for eternity? That seems odd. And yet neither group would think it was in heaven if heaven corresponded to what the opposite sex imagined for heaven.
For instance, for Camera Girl, heaven would be the place where I would constantly admit that she had been right about some piece of advice or other. And for me heaven would be that place where she anticipated all of my requests ahead of time and sandwiches and coffee were endlessly available. And she never questioned my infallible judgement.
It’s a seeming paradox.
But on reflection I remember that God is male so I have to assume that in the afterlife women will be given the grace to recognize that they’ve been wrong all along and now feel celestial joy in finally appreciating the truth and gratitude toward men for putting up with their illogical thinking all of these millennia.
There is an old movie with William Powell called “Life with Father.” It takes place in 1880s New York City and Powell is Clarnece Day Senior, a prosperous stock broker and the patriarch of a family of four sons. His wife Vinny is a cheerful, well-meaning woman whose lack of financial ability drives Clarence to distraction whenever he tries to keep control over the household budget.
Toward the end of the movie, Clarence is attempting to explain women to his son Clarence Junior who is eighteen. He says, “Clarence understanding women is very difficult. They think … No, I’m wrong already. They don’t think at all. What they do is get stirred up! And they get stirred up about almost anything. But don’t you let them try to confuse you. Don’t you let them.”
And Clarence Day Senior was entirely correct. They get stirred up. And when they do logic and normalcy go out the window. Of course, in 1880 women were forty years away from getting the vote and the possibility of good governance and sanity were still a possibility.
I often think about who these male morons were who voluntarily voted for women to get the franchise. Exactly how stupid must they have been? I assume they were communists of one stripe or another. But even communists couldn’t have wanted the chaos and confusion that female voting would surely bring. But here we are.
Being an optimist, I still look forward to the day when an amendment to reverse women’s suffrage passes. After all it goes hand in hand with the amendment for reversing prohibition. That was after people saw how much damage it had done and the damage done by prohibition pales in comparison to what women voting has done. Think of all the awful candidates, almost exclusively Democrats have been elected because women got stirred up. Women voting was almost responsible for electing Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris to the presidency. And surely even women can see how disastrous those administrations would have been.
But as optimistic as I am I fear it will take some really catastrophic result of woman voting to convince them to voluntarily give up the vote. So, it is a somber optimism. But that’s the way of the world. We must be patient.


