I was on a zoom call with a couple of friends who live in central Massachusetts and they were telling me that the pot business is a howling success. There are billboards on all the state highways. The “dispensaries” as the pot shops are known are doing a land office business. And we discussed how exactly the “growers” managed to protect their crop. The theory was that although there were probably some crops outdoors, hidden from the view of the populace, mostly the stuff is being grown in locked greenhouses. And we assumed this means that the “farmers” must have fairly robust security and probably a few guns thrown in for good measure. One of the guys said that the biggest problem that’s become apparent is that the stuff being sold today is many times more potent than the stuff that used to be sold before legalization. He mentioned THC levels that were near 90%. And the upshot of this is psychological symptoms among the users are much worse and much more prevalent than in the past. Anxiety and paranoia manifest at levels that render the users incapable of normal life. They can’t keep a job or maintain relationships.
And it just struck me that here is a blue state policy to contrast with their alleged commitment to safety on the COVID front. They’ll force you to be vaccinated and wear a mask against your will supposedly for your own good but they’ll allow a practice that they know is a mental and physical health threat and also a public safety hazard from the consideration of people driving under the influence and walking among us in a mentally unbalanced state. In addition, since the FDA still considers marijuana illegal, they won’t get involved in regulating the safety of the pot that’s being sold and so any terrible mistake involving pesticides or other toxins finding its way into the drug cannot be prevented or adjudicated.
So here is the double standard. They get to decide when freedom is important and when it’s not. Freedom for me but not for thee. But this definitely opens up the model for how the red states can change things in their favor. Pick and choose the places where they will obey or defy federal law. As an example, Texas needs to close their border with Mexico. They should build their own wall a mile inside the federal wall. They should arrest all illegal aliens and jail them until they agree to leave the country and if they come back make their next stay in jail very uncomfortable. They should force all employers to obey immigration laws under the penalty of massive fines. If the federal government squawks flip them the bird and continue on with real life. And there are other things that make sense. Welfare needs to be tightened up to the point where those who refuse to work should be so hard-up that they decide to leave and go to a blue state like California on their own. Hell, that could be part of the policy to offer them bus or plane tickets to the blue state of their choice.
So that was what I was thinking about today. Instead of freedom for thee but not for me let’s make it you live your life your way and I’ll live my life mine.
Back in 2009 when attempts were underway to extradite Roman Polansky to the US to try him for the rape of a 13-year-old girl, Harvey Weinstein defended the morality of Hollywood’s support of Polansky with the following quote “Hollywood has the best moral compass, because it has compassion.” Well, it starts to make sense that Weinstein has compassion for a rapist. I guess he’s hoping the favor will be returned by his community. I don’t mean the community of rapists. That’s too small a group to help him. I think he’s hoping the Hollywood community will show him compassion. But it doesn’t look like he’s going to get a pass. A whole troop of former ingenues and struggling starlets are coming forward with staggering tales of a disgusting pig trading on his influence in a seedy industry to pressure young women into having sex with him. Now the fact that Harvey is a repulsively fat and ugly creature only makes the act grotesque. But even if he looked like Brad Pitt the cruelty and immorality of what he did is undeniable. So, he’s going to be roasted over the coals. And based on the latest reports he may also be liable for criminal charges. Apparently three women are now claiming actual rape. You know Whoopi? Rape, rape?
Poor Harvey, things aren’t looking so good. All his friends have deserted him. What’s a rapist to do? Where is his Polansky exception? After all he’s a rich liberal donor. Where’s the gratitude? Where are the Clintons and Obamas when they’re needed? People are saying it’s because times are changing and women won’t put up with abuse anymore.
But maybe it’s just Hollywood deciding that Harvey’s power and influence is slipping. Maybe this is payback from some other power broker that Harvey rubbed the wrong way. Maybe even the Clintons. I read that the Clintons didn’t think Harvey was supportive enough. Maybe this is more Arkansas Revenge. Considering Bill’s proclivities, it would be ironic indeed if it came from him. But regardless of the actual cause of the downfall the real question is where was the compassion for his victims?
Meryl Streep was a great friend of Harvey Weinstein. She worked with him and gushed about his abilities. But she still maintains that she knew nothing of his casting couch. Apparently, she’s the only one in Hollywood who didn’t. Unless she’s a moron, she’s lying. And as much as I’d love to call her a moron I’m gonna have to go with liar. And so, the question is, where was Meryl’s compassion for his victims?
And how about all the other actors and actresses and other studio types who helped Harvey procure his victims or else just kept quiet about their existence? Where was all this great compassion? What about the much-vaunted moral compass? Did it merely point to fortune and fame? These are the people who go on endlessly about gay rights and trans-rights and animal rights and veganism and climate change. And these are the people who went insane because a woman didn’t get to be President of the United States. And these are the people who marched through the streets with stupid pink hats on because a rich guy admitted “off the record” the deep dark secret that some women are greedy enough to let a lout have his way with them just because he’s rich.
Well, doesn’t that make them hypocrites and cowards? If they really care about women’s welfare so highly then aren’t they therefore nothing but greedy cowards if they put their own monetary considerations ahead of these young people being victimized? Seems so to me. Sorry Meryl. You stand convicted of being a greedy coward. The only compassion you had was for yourself. Same as Harvey. Same as Polansky. So maybe the Polansky defenders can explain why they have compassion for their sister actresses now finally after all these years of Weinstein’s harassment but not before. And maybe they can explain why they still have no compassion for the 13-year-old girl that was abused all those years ago. Isn’t she a woman too?