It’s a remarkable testament of election fraud. It sounds very convincing.
About 33 years ago I moved out of New York City. Now I was born and bred there. My family had lived there for four generations. I liked the amenities that the City possessed. I could take the kids to Central Park and to the American Museum of Natural History or the Metropolitan Museum of Art. We could go to a Yankee or Met game, go to the beach, go fishing out of Sheepshead Bay. It was my home. I liked my neighbors. But this was in the mid-eighties and things had gotten steadily more dangerous even in a relatively “safe” neighborhood like the one I lived in. Muggers had taken to getting off the expressways in “safe” neighborhoods early in the morning and mugging old ladies as they walked to Early Mass at church. And they didn’t just get robbed they were often brutalized pretty badly. Apparently, a baseball bat to the shoulder from behind is an excellent way to make an old lady drop her pocketbook. And thinking about what it would cost to put my young children in good schools in New York just wasn’t in the cards for me at that time. So, we moved out into the “country.” Or so we called it. Really it was outer suburbia in New England but there were farms and cows and so we told our kids they lived in the country. Fast forward twenty-five years and we moved again out of the “country” because it became too crowded.
And that’s just what growth looks like. Instead of 275 million people now there are 330 million people. But moving from outer suburbia to a more rural area is a matter of choice and temperament, not a life or death decision. I like more trees and fewer stop lights. I want a quiet environment rather than a busy commercial strip. But the next guy might like to live in a small town so he can walk to get his cup of coffee and doughnut. He likes to have a French restaurant and a yoga studio a few blocks away. Vive la différence.
But instead, let’s say you live in Minneapolis or Philadelphia or Baltimore or even my old home town of New York City. For the sake of argument let’s say you live right outside of New York City in a very expensive suburb. You pay an enormous amount of money to buy a house there and you pay taxes that are almost obscene. Let’s say the schools are good and the amenities in your town are excellent. Great restaurants and stores. Good health clubs and a very nice golf course that you enjoy. And crime is reasonable. Sure, there are property crimes that happen, burglaries and car theft but violent crime while not unknown is infrequent because you have a good police force that prevents that sort of thing. Your very nice gated community is a haven from the urban existence that you can see on the horizon.
But then something happens. A cop in a city with a Democratic mayor kills a black man during an arrest. And he does it in front of a video camera and it looks terrible. People in this liberal city in this liberal state feel outraged. The very liberal mayor fires the cops involved and says an investigation will judge whether the law was broken. Nothing unusual there. This has happened before. But this mayor is extremely weak. When the protests begin, he warns the police to back off. They do. And the protestors are heavily infiltrated by Antifa and anarchists and probably BLM. They don’t just protest. They riot, loot and burn down a sizable area of the downtown. Does the mayor decide to put a stop to the violence after that? Far from it. He orders the police to abandon their precinct to the mob. Now the devastation becomes extensive and drunk with the victory of the city’s capitulation they decide to extend their reign of terror and head out into the suburbs of the next city over. And when the Democratic governor realizes that the Mayor is useless, he proves that he is equally useless and only sends a few hundred National Guardsmen in and mostly just to guard the electric power station and Federal Reserve Bank building. So now the rioters are free to continue their arson and looting.
After this has gone on for a day or two the inner-city denizens and the local Antifa cohorts in every major city decide it’s time to set up a local chapter of burn everything down and steal whatever comes to hand. So now it gets real for you. You’re watching on tv as the metropolis that’s fifteen minutes away begins to go up in flames and the cops stand down at the behest of Bill de Blasio in order not to annoy his constituency while they enjoy their first amendment right to loot and burn other people’s life’s savings. And in a video on social media you hear the rioters tell you, seemingly you in particular, that they’re headed out to your suburb to bring the same treatment to you and yours.
Well, that’s got to be an eye opener. And the more you think about it the more you realize that there’s not a damn thing anyone is going to do to end this cycle. This happens periodically. First it happened in 1965, then in 1977. In the late seventies through the early nineties it never really stopped. The violence and crime were continuous. Giuliani was a change in New York. He was the last gasp of a majority that would allow the police to keep the criminal elements under strict control. The nineties were peaceful and prosperous for New York. But Giuliani was term limited out in 2001. Bloomberg left the police in place but constantly railed against them in the press. By the time Obama and de Blasio were in the White House and Gracie Mansion respectively, it was open season on the police and law and order too. Eric Holder demonized the police and spawned Black Lives Matter. Now you could say that President Trump is a reaction to Obama and the Ferguson scam that keeps being perpetrated on the people. And he can do a lot to prevent this stuff spreading to red states. But if you live in a blue state and especially if you live close to one of the big cities in them you are at ground zero for every wave of the roller coaster.
And that brings me to my point.
There’s no good reason to live there. The bad reasons are that it’s your home. And it’s where your family lives. I don’t live near one of the big cities but I wish I were a thousand miles away in a red state. But I have kids and grandkids that have roots here. And every day I try to figure out how to get us all out. But if you’re starting out now or are going to start a family, get out now. Head south and west and look for a state that is run by normal people and isn’t filled with people who don’t have any stuff but want your stuff instead. I assure you from sad experience, it’s no way to live.
New York City is an enormous place. Something like eight million people live within the confines of the five boroughs and twelve million more live in the adjacent areas of New York, New Jersey, Connecticut and even Pennsylvania that act as bedroom communities for the people who make a living off of that gigantic place.
And along with that enormity is an enormously difficult and dangerous job of keeping such a place safe. Along with the NYPD there are the police departments of all the adjacent communities and the state troopers of New York and the adjacent states. All told, there are tens of thousands of police officers in the New York City area but compare that to twenty million people and you realize the necessity for maintaining the respect and legitimacy of police officers in the New York City area.
Back when I was a young man living in New York in the nineteen seventies and eighties, crime was a frightening fact of life. Even the “safe” neighborhoods had been invaded by violent criminals who “mugged” the unsuspecting and often weaker members of the community wherever the opportunity offered. The democrat mayors of the city payed lip service to policing the problems but because of their dependence on votes from the African American and Latino communities they were careful never to embrace too openly the law and order aspect of the city’s responsibilities. But when David Dinkins became the first African American mayor in 1990 his first responsibility was to his ethnic constituency and that ensured the effective handcuffing of the NYPD and gave a carte blanche to criminals.
But back then even New York liberals knew that unfettered criminality would destroy their home. So, they did the unthinkable, they elected Rudy Giuliani mayor. Giuliani was a republican and a former US Attorney who had prosecuted mafia bosses and high-profile criminals. He put in place a highly effective neighborhood policing strategy that targeted both low level crime (broken windows offenses) and serious crime (robbery and violent crime) and in the space of a few years made New York City one of the safest big cities in the United States. But being a republican, albeit a relatively liberal one, and having made his reputation by embracing law enforcement, the democratic City Council enacted term limits for the first time in city history to prevent him from governing for more than eight years.
His successor Michael Bloomberg ran as a republican (in name only) and saw the mayoral term limit law removed so that he could serve for twelve years. Being a creature of the liberal establishment Bloomberg would often excoriate any police incident that showed up in the bleeding-heart liberal New York media. But he was at least smart enough to mostly leave in place the police practices that Giuliani had pioneered.
But then two things happened. Barack Obama became President of the Unites States and Bill de Blasio became Mayor of New York. Obama and his Attorney General Eric Holder used the Justice Department to criminalize and prosecute police officers whenever an opportunity arose in the media that could be construed as police brutality against African American criminals. It spawned the Black Lives Matters organization which was responsible for the deaths of police officers in several American cities. But de Blasio embraced it and has effectively handcuffed police effectiveness in New York City. As part of his police policy, “stop and frisk” and broken windows policing have been eliminated. Due to this, quality of life crimes have started to proliferate again. And more recently, violent crime, which until recently had been close to non-existent is becoming a day to day reality for the first time since the early nineteen nineties.
And that’s where we are today. The progressives have a firm hold on New York City politics but the demographics of left-wing politics have changed. New York is a minority majority city and the old left-wing ethnicities are no longer in control. It may no longer be possible for a Rudy Giuliani type reformer to be brought in to clean up de Blasio’s crime problem.
When anti-Semitism against the easily recognizable Orthodox Jewish community is being perpetrated by African Americans, both on a day to day low level harassment basis and in deadly attacks as have recently occurred, it becomes difficult for de Blasio and the other New York progressives to get people to believe that white supremacists are responsible for the problem. I mean he’ll still try, but as seen in that link, it’s getting a little thick.
So, where does this leave the New York Jewish community? Their voting record, with exceptions, puts them squarely in line with progressive candidates on the local, state and national level. So, essentially, they have themselves helped to create this monster by electing Barack Obama, Andrew Cuomo and Bill de Blasio to the positions that allowed them to hamstring the only entity that could have protected them, the New York Police Department. And once the police saw that their bosses no longer had their backs, they stopped doing their jobs. Why risk being sent to prison for trying to prevent crime? Now they just clean up the pieces after the damage is done.
Some in the Jewish community are advocating for a return to sane police policy but the more pragmatic voices, knowing the reality of where they are, are calling for their communities to hire private armed security forces for their houses of worship. And that is indeed highly ironic. After eliminating the public security force that made it possible for all of New York City to thrive they now are forced to provide for themselves a private police force to protect them from the criminals they have empowered.
Those in the more upscale New York City communities were in the vanguard of movements such as Black Lives Matter and other initiatives begun during the Obama and de Blasio administrations. Now they are living with the results of those movements. Currently it is still at the periphery of their community, with the non-progressive elements such as the Orthodox community bearing the brunt of the problem. But just as back in the 1980s these problems eventually find their way back to the “safe” neighborhoods. The question for them will be what happens when the Narrative breaks down on their own doorstep?
Rudy Giuliani is a pitbull when he talks to the press. He won’t let them buffalo him and he always has the right answers. Listen to him here refuting the official narrative and getting his story out. He says he has the goods on Biden and Son in the Ukraine. Testimony like this would be amazing. Let’s hope the Senate doesn’t weasel out of it.
A priest, a rabbi and a minister happen to meet in a bar. Everybody has heard these kinds of jokes. Let’s try a different kind of joke. A cokehead, a gangster’s nephew and the heir to a ketchup fortune met in Washington. Well that doesn’t sound as funny. Wait, it gets better. Especially since the gangster is the recently dearly departed Whitey Bulger, the cokehead’s father is Joe Biden and John Kerry is the stepfather of the Prince of Ketchup. Ah, now you see. Each of these men has been able to turn nepotism into a pot of gold. There’s definitely something funny going on there but it’s definitely not a coincidence that these three men met up. Joe Biden and John Kerry were powerful members of the Obama administration who allowed their relatives to trade off their names with foreign governments that could benefit from decisions of the Obama administration. James Bulger is just the latest manifestation of the Massachusetts proclivity for shady politics. James’s father, Billy Bulger, was Whitey’s brother but he was also the President of the Massachusetts Senate for eighteen years and used his influence to enrich himself and his family and insinuate them into circles that would perpetuate their influence. And, of course, John Kerry and Billy Bulger are old Bay State friends.
Apparently, this is what all the hullaballoo was about with the Russia-gate scam. The Obama administration was a giant grift where the leaders used their relatives to siphon off billions using influence peddling operations. If China wanted to buy up American military technology companies, well Hunter Biden would partner with them to make it seem legitimate. It meant greasing some palms, but the Chinese got what they wanted and so did the Bidens. It sounds a lot like the Clinton uranium scam for the Russians. And it also includes the Ukraine grift. And after Hillary and company lost the election, they started the Russiagate frame-up to deflect attention from their own foreign crimes. And yet somehow, we’re supposed to believe that the same CIA and FBI that seems to have wire-taps in every room in the White House didn’t know a thing about Hillary’s and Biden’s grifts. That’s the unfunny joke.
I watched Rudy Giuliani make the rounds with the television political pundits. He laid out the evidence and made the case that all the evidence being ignored by the Press and the Deep State is a mountain compared to the molehill of the alleged whistleblower in the CIA that is all over the front pages of all the MSM outlets. He declared he is waiting for the Justice Department to do something about it. But will they?
We are about to find out if Barr is a real American or just another swamp dweller. With all the information out there, if the Justice Department takes no action at all then basically Trump is on his own. In fact, wouldn’t Barr know that someone had changed the definition of whistleblower to include hearsay? Could something as rigged as that rule change happen without alarm bells going off in the Attorney General’s office?
But an even larger issue is the fact that the surveillance state now controls the actions of the President of the United States. Unelected spies control the actions of our elected officials and spy on all of us too. President Trump has the unenviable task of draining the swamp while fighting off the nine-headed Lernaean Hydra of mythology that inhabits the swamp. And just like that mythical beast every time one head is cut off (e.g., Comey or Brennan) three more grow back.
I’ve come to believe that the only way to get back control of our country is to dismantle the surveillance apparatus. In a way I think it would be a good platform for the President to run on in 2020. Purging Washington of these wannabe KGB masterminds would be popular with many moderates and independents too.
When I imagine how I would tackle the job that Barr is supposed to do, I imagine assembling all the upper echelons of, let’s say, the CIA and after explaining how allowing the resistance to sabotage the Trump Administration is dereliction of duty I’d fire the whole top level of the organization. Then while these big shots were being rudely escorted off the premises, I would address their direct reports with the following ultimatum, provide evidence of who the remaining obstructionists are or immediately follow their former bosses out the door. I would give them at least five minutes to make up their minds if they wanted to cooperate and if they didn’t volunteer information by then I’d have them escorted out the door and move on to the next echelon down. This plan has the advantage that as you move down the chain of command the importance of a pay check becomes more and more critical. Eventually you will reach someone who would rather be an employed civil servant than an unemployed resistance fighter.
As you can see, I have a very unsubtle way of looking at things but the point is, cleaning out that rat’s nest needs to be done somehow or other. When rampant government malfeasance is ignored by the FBI and CIA but these same agencies abuse their power to hamper the legitimately elected representatives of the people it’s time to start over.
Now that the President has started down this road it can’t be more than a week or two before we know whether Barr is there to clean up or cover up the mess. Fingers crossed.
Back a few years ago two brothers had the demented idea that setting off a couple of shrapnel bombs at the Boston Marathon finish line was a good idea. Their family were Muslim refugees from the Caucasus region. This was their idea of a fitting thanks for being taken in. While the police hunted these two maniacs down in the Eastern Massachusetts environs, the Media and the Democrats in Massachusetts state and local government and then President Obama immediately started using the expression Boston Strong. It was meant to imply that Boston not only was too strong to let death and maiming disturb them but also that only weaklings would blame Muslims for wanting to blow them up. It was a bizarre proposition. I was trying to understand if it was beneath their dignity to try to prevent a recurrence of the bombing. Would that be a sign of weakness?
Now we have New York City doing their best impression of Boston Strong. New York Strong. Just go about your business. Attend the Halloween parade. If you think terror attacks are unacceptable then the terrorists win. Just shake it off. No plan from the Mayor or Governor for keeping New Yorkers safe from a recurrence. No mention that the killer was a known threat. Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain. Business as usual. Just the price to pay for enjoying ethnic foods and all that great diversity. No one’s to blame (except maybe Trump for riling up these good people). The Muslim Mayor of London has taken it a step further and declared that terror attacks are just business as usual in a with-it cosmopolitan place like London. Kind of like expensive parking.
And of course the candlelight vigils and the celebrity condolences. And big stars too! Taylor Swift, Jared Leto, Patricia Arquette, Josh Groban, David Harbour, Bette Midler, Josh Gad, Zoe Saldana, Sam Smith, Will Arnett. Wow, star power.
And most impressive, a message from Boy George: “God bless you New York. You are a strong, vibrant, multicultural city and nothing will ever bring you down! My heart is with you!” Well that’s a relief. If Boy George’s heart is with us, there can’t be anything really too wrong with the current situation. Maybe this is really a good thing in disguise. We’re not only strong but vibrant and multicultural. Of course, the multicultural thing does make me think about the Uzbeki contingent. Maybe we should look at that part again. No, no that’s badthink.
I remember about sixteen years ago New York wasn’t feeling too strong to want a little payback. But that was back before Obama and Bloomberg re-educated the City on who was really responsible for that attack. It was all those ignorant yahoos who were clinging to their guns and God. They annoyed those peaceful adherents to the religion of peace. Back then even dyed in the wool pacifists like Maureen Dowd were happy to see George Bush would protect America from attack and in fact would retaliate against Al Qaeda.
Full disclosure, I was born and spent the first thirty years of my life in New York City. I still have family there. When the 9/11 attacks ocurred I was outraged to a degree that is hard to explain. And I was proud of the City and the Country for the way they responded to the crisis. Giuliani and Bush responded extremely admirably and with great competency.
I don’t think there is anything left in New York City that could react to a real attack now. Looking at the tepid response to this latest attack I’m guessing if the Freedom Tower was brought down by a terrorist attack that New York Strong would mean putting a tarp up over the rubble and a rezoning action to prevent any other tall building from being erected to tempt the purveyors of peace. And of course, Boy George would send a strong, vibrant, multicultural tweet.